[ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6038 (4260)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 05 February 2015 02:54 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1371A01F7 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:54:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9_PD_n4XguOA for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:54:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C491A1A01EC for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:54:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E31B21832B6; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:54:01 -0800 (PST)
To: acmorton@att.com, lencia@att.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@trammell.ch, ietf@wjcerveny.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150205025401.E31B21832B6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:54:01 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/e3CQ8dBnbLFW47s1KhndliGtims>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com, ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6038 (4260)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 02:54:21 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6038, "Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6038&eid=4260 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Huck Zhao <Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com> Section: 5.2.1 Original Text ------------- ... When the Reflect Octets mode is selected, the Session-Sender SHALL use the following TWAMP-Test Packet Format in Unauthenticated mode: It should be Session-Reflector that SHALL use the following format. Corrected Text -------------- ... When the Reflect Octets mode is selected, the Session-Reflector SHALL use the following TWAMP-Test Packet Format in Unauthenticated mode: Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features Publication Date : October 2010 Author(s) : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Metrics Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (4260) RFC Errata System
- [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6038 (4260) RFC Errata System