[ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6038 (4259)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 05 February 2015 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6341A01C6 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:49:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I5TUN4CUvNqJ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC3D1A0072 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6FB8A1832B6; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:48:45 -0800 (PST)
To: acmorton@att.com, lencia@att.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@trammell.ch, ietf@wjcerveny.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20150205024845.6FB8A1832B6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:48:45 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/vw53E6SKETQKc2KaF9x-CWQHGB0>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com, ippm@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6038 (4259)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 02:49:06 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6038,
"Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6038&eid=4259

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Huck Zhao <Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com>

Section: 5.2

Original Text
-------------
o  Symmetrical Size mode: The Session-Reflector MUST operate using
      the Session_Reflector Packet Format defined in Section 5.1.4,
      where the Padding Octets are separated from the information
      fields.

Section 5.1.4 defines Session_Sender Packet Format.

Corrected Text
--------------
o  Symmetrical Size mode: The Session-Reflector MUST operate using
      the Session_Sender Packet Format defined in Section 5.1.4,
      where the Padding Octets are separated from the information
      fields.

Notes
-----


Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features
Publication Date    : October 2010
Author(s)           : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IP Performance Metrics
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG