[ippm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6038 (4259)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 13 January 2016 18:13 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB81B1B3059; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:13:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zb-Wu0le38pC; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F261B3055; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1B51F18019E; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:12:33 -0800 (PST)
To: Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com, acmorton@att.com, lencia@att.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160113181233.1B51F18019E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:12:33 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/uBoI7b0ei5CnDqGrNSQLYh6JatY>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ippm@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6038 (4259)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:13:25 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC6038, "Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6038&eid=4259 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Huck Zhao <Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com> Date Reported: 2015-02-04 Held by: Spencer Dawkins (IESG) Section: 5.2 Original Text ------------- o Symmetrical Size mode: The Session-Reflector MUST operate using the Session_Reflector Packet Format defined in Section 5.1.4, where the Padding Octets are separated from the information fields. Section 5.1.4 defines Session_Sender Packet Format. Corrected Text -------------- o Symmetrical Size mode: The Session-Reflector MUST operate using the Session_Sender Packet Format defined in Section 5.1.4, where the Padding Octets are separated from the information fields. Notes ----- This is just dropping a sentence that repeats what was just said previously. -------------------------------------- RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features Publication Date : October 2010 Author(s) : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Metrics Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6038 (4259) RFC Errata System
- [ippm] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC6038 … RFC Errata System