IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Draft agenda for IETF 104

Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> Wed, 13 March 2019 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tpauly@apple.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6481274A1 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5V6zUolBwEU for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp03.apple.com (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp03.apple.com [17.171.2.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A680124B19 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp03.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp03.apple.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2D0MCNu019560; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:14 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=mime-version : content-type : sender : from : message-id : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=422XimOE/Ctb1bWuLneI90RhSsQ3VP5CTgjwoDgsSDo=; b=dYX3AONuq5L2FL9/TuskN2N9j6IaXKemQB/3gWqIVo8XCjdUZ3uw8e6yDxlDn1Wf3WVS rdCTIsSlVYF8NJYHdyh1UJKtTi4JE1Udy7jYTb69NWTP5WoZJItU1fgmRp4GZNlBEO0M WuQX4/heOpJwAB91ioPCRIwre72AwaBoQai3/j2Etnf7wQ7TD7GQa9eikHo5ZKgfxwR7 BVR44K/dA5/r8l1uX5phRx1XmVamU/457mCF3vCMPqluqLCO3/+ijSGGD/oLKGiQy+dO lU6L5bwlqcWyUY28p2QTBVQU8HS39z6y7oJbyMsaS88ga7G+n0QTaB/zxAyhGB2hbTUb OQ==
Received: from mr2-mtap-s03.rno.apple.com (mr2-mtap-s03.rno.apple.com [17.179.226.135]) by ma1-aaemail-dr-lapp03.apple.com with ESMTP id 2r4dc4nknp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:14 -0700
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_QfPQoRuaBNVOflOYVoePYA)"
Received: from nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com (nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com [17.128.115.216]) by mr2-mtap-s03.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.3.20181024 64bit (built Oct 24 2018)) with ESMTPS id <0POA00GYC3SEHGD1@mr2-mtap-s03.rno.apple.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com by nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.3.20181024 64bit (built Oct 24 2018)) id <0POA008003D6G600@nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 72672b1975ecc2e0dbad1c33384dbf98
X-Va-E-CD: 9124662085dada4107e6482c1195aa92
X-Va-R-CD: da061dadf7e7a764ade431a163bea3d0
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: f063f2c8-3e0e-4df9-9c8d-05e2d2172105
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 1b7e4f4dab179820cbb0a121fe2fe7dc
X-V-E-CD: 9124662085dada4107e6482c1195aa92
X-V-R-CD: da061dadf7e7a764ade431a163bea3d0
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 7b2d83ad-a9f1-401d-bc00-11c86cc1786f
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-12_14:,, signatures=0
Received: from [17.230.135.213] (unknown [17.230.135.213]) by nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.2.3.20181024 64bit (built Oct 24 2018)) with ESMTPSA id <0POA00EHY3SD6V60@nwk-mmpp-sz13.apple.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: tpauly@apple.com
From: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Message-id: <B6815E8D-48F3-45E8-B71C-C6F3EEBBF7EF@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:24:12 -0700
In-reply-to: <CA+RyBmWS58i3qNgit1P9YZSZn5Op+J4+caWGe8kORJpwXJb-fA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
References: <F2ABDB31-380C-43B1-9B3D-BB5C5E309DD8@apple.com> <CA+RyBmWS58i3qNgit1P9YZSZn5Op+J4+caWGe8kORJpwXJb-fA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-12_14:, , signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/EkZaMYWG9tyirKlRTvbC98-Xn5M>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Draft agenda for IETF 104
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:24:18 -0000

To clarify, the time allocated for IOAM is not allocated just to discuss draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data. That currently is the one IOAM document that is a WG document, but there is a list of many other documents that have been submitted as "-ippm" individual drafts. We want to use this time to figure out collectively as a group how we want to approach this work going forward, and where the documents best belong. The goal of this discussion is to come out with a clear picture of what work we think makes sense for IPPM. This will hopefully be more fruitful than having many individual lightning talks for these topics.

Best,
Tommy

> On Mar 12, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tommy,
> given how dense is our agenda for Prague, allotting 40 minutes for one draft seems as overgenerous. If there are updates to IOAM individual drafts, then should these be explicitly listed among other individual drafts that have allocated 5 minutes each?
> 
> Kind regards,
> Greg
> 
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:35 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> Hello IPPM,
> 
> We've posted our draft agent for IETF 104 here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/agenda-104-ippm-00 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/agenda-104-ippm-00>
> 
> We have a two-hour slot, and are pretty full! The chairs have discussed and would like to have two more extended discussions this time about:
> - Finalizing the metrics and initial registries, so we can get those out the door
> - How we should progress with IOAM and the large cluster of related documents. We'll ask that instead of having any lightning talks on related IOAM documents, we have a broader discussion about what we're doing for these.
> 
> After that, the agenda is made up of 5 minute lightning talks, with a group of related alt-mark documents at the start. Apologies that we can't have longer time for these!
> 
> Suggestions or bashing welcome!
> 
> Best,
> Tommy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email