Re: [ippm] Draft agenda for IETF 104

Hi Tommy,
I understand and agree that the group needs such discussion. But I'm not
sure we, as a group championing IPPM, can say more than These drafts don't
really fit in. To help authors to find other groups they need to reach out
to Area Directors.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:24 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> To clarify, the time allocated for IOAM is not allocated just to
> discuss draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data. That currently is the one IOAM document
> that is a WG document, but there is a list of many other documents that
> have been submitted as "-ippm" individual drafts. We want to use this time
> to figure out collectively as a group how we want to approach this work
> going forward, and where the documents best belong. The goal of this
> discussion is to come out with a clear picture of what work we think makes
> sense for IPPM. This will hopefully be more fruitful than having many
> individual lightning talks for these topics.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
>
> On Mar 12, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tommy,
> given how dense is our agenda for Prague, allotting 40 minutes for one
> draft seems as overgenerous. If there are updates to IOAM individual
> drafts, then should these be explicitly listed among other individual
> drafts that have allocated 5 minutes each?
>
> Kind regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:35 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=
> 40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello IPPM,
>>
>> We've posted our draft agent for IETF 104 here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/104/materials/agenda-104-ippm-00
>>
>> We have a two-hour slot, and are pretty full! The chairs have discussed
>> and would like to have two more extended discussions this time about:
>> - Finalizing the metrics and initial registries, so we can get those out
>> the door
>> - How we should progress with IOAM and the large cluster of related
>> documents. We'll ask that instead of having any lightning talks on related
>> IOAM documents, we have a broader discussion about what we're doing for
>> these.
>>
>> After that, the agenda is made up of 5 minute lightning talks, with a
>> group of related alt-mark documents at the start. Apologies that we can't
>> have longer time for these!
>>
>> Suggestions or bashing welcome!
>>
>> Best,
>> Tommy
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> ippm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>>
>
>