[ippm] Follow-up on Error Performance Measurement presentation at IETF-110

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Wed, 07 April 2021 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC9C3A2D86; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n8tSnOzUJ8GF; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2318F3A2D83; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id o16so22678449ljp.3; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 16:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lkA1S9xuHatMDScPN2BlnR9ES9zNKAiXBBR4i3baEbE=; b=G59+zV0mJrRUN/n1QpJ9o1DhjBXe788UCIi/OnEM4jpNhyJfTiP9vJiJQUp5JONGBp khRlUKnNcVlBwoI0/RVHp1fOWAe2mkTWftdMMtaArdVf0Qd6nYoBpR3FooQjh02gu/VF jBqfBc2pK95ZChpLRoq73GEBAi0I9hGK8S2AYpoFnU9tHOpd4fBR9XMDrH+lNAtESJkV tbPT9MZ6CFO2bINn7Jzj6htvvwJTrUr9Ws0R1bs5RrSibTuNnyUvGGPz+g+5oVc/Imu3 2JP6ZvoCCy4rJQSyElc7Nyy9dViI19/g9xlZYdpBHsxvVfnOWpx5s55IngoGITq8AekM ZtTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lkA1S9xuHatMDScPN2BlnR9ES9zNKAiXBBR4i3baEbE=; b=o4s7CLyTSDqfsMlTop8wcn5gcSFut6koegdihCTXLOb6Vl9LHhoKRYkaxHS+hEi81x qMaiCDP2/ftNGWAaw1wIHCj29QsY27MXJfD74AA1uxl8HiR/CUNNFX9HaQ4LX3sjrI/3 W50zq6mq8NnCTWhe+a9MH0JhuPHBGge03p1TvAF+UZk2f9Ld9LkD9hVQKdYpaeMWssFI Z+P1G6rjABKaDT2OCPbmOYJCFRsBzCvo0J0n6rrqwn1WqH1SDF24gCksgAhCauT0rYiU uDzga3HSAdNk4WgFbWyG1WZc3fJB6s6rsfjXh0Gx1SNPojBUS+Lqadm5QR0hXo6f8+lA 8flg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530APaFVHd1k8JFZNOOB3cPAAS4FoeNyghyVHAuMAU9qzRNMICEV CH3kIWmdD4HB3KNFa7yAKJd1sIKxB6uCT2jgT00lHvxq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNmlLukcu8XAlPbPx+Bx31cR/l9CxX6sxdGTOs59j5jgMFU3ui8zsNnXbGGFqQ3AE5aVfHxswTT2a2/W4NPcQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3a17:: with SMTP id h23mr3676774lja.158.1617836659983; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 16:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 16:04:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUrUzMdRAK1GDjYxivdFiSsL0FtJ8sjhxH=DGKQ5_dG7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000006c6f7605bf69f34c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/HueyWCt9V0zWyLImVyLz1jN8wW8>
Subject: [ippm] Follow-up on Error Performance Measurement presentation at IETF-110
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:04:30 -0000

Dear All,
in the course of presenting our work on the Error Performance Measurement
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-ippm-epm/> (slides
attached), I didn't mention the work on the Integrated OAM
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mmm-rtgwg-integrated-oam/>. The
Integrated OAM work was presented and discussed at the RTGWG session during
the IETF-110. We believe that EPM is one of the use cases that highlight
the benefits of using the Integrated OAM. We believe that experts from IPPM
and RTGWG WGs would be interested to see how the works we've presented are
related to each other and help to solve challenges in operating networks.
The authors always welcome your questions, comment, and suggestions.

Regards,
Greg