[ippm] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 03 December 2019 19:20 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C99412000F; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:20:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ietf@wjcerveny.com, ippm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.111.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <157540083363.24740.938613141509490611.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 11:20:33 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/K78K_cSGw-shi-N5XBgjcR6-ipI>
Subject: [ippm] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 19:20:33 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Section 9. Please consider adding something approximately along the lines of: The aggregated results of the performance metrics described in this registry can reveal network topology information that might be considered sensitive. If this is the case, access control mechanism should be applied. * Editorial Nits: - Section 7.1.2. Typo. s/obervations/ observations/ - Section 7.1.3. Typo. s/formated/formatted/ - Section 7.3.1. Typo. s/unambigious/unambiguous/ - Section 7.3.2. Typo. s/wether/whether/ - Section 7.3.5. Typo. s/accomodated/accommodated/ - Section 7.4.4. Typo. s/calbration/calibration/ - Section 8.1. Spacing. s/[RFC8126]policy/[RFC8126] policy/ - Section 8.2. Typo. s/Regsirty/Registry/ - Section 8.2. Typo. s/unchamged/unchanged/ - Section 9. Typo. s/secuity/security/
- [ippm] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)