[ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-11: (with COMMENT)
Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 21 June 2018 13:12 UTC
Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4255130E2A; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang@ietf.org, Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com, ippm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152958677666.31598.2871670854497240031.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:12:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/MG4kQ0VHs_cSdWBIs9Y0C_ie0oA>
Subject: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:12:57 -0000
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Adam's DISCUSS. Section 1.1: I'm surprised to see the two references to the long-expired NFVRG drafts. If a reference to describe virtualized infrastructure using orchestration is really needed (I'm not convinced that it is), I would assume a better reference exists from outside the IETF/IRTF. Section 5.2: OLD "Encrypted mode 'makes it impossible to alter timestamps undetectably.' See also Section 4 of RFC 7717 and Section 6 of RFC 4656." NEW "Encrypted mode 'makes it impossible to alter timestamps undetectably' [Section 6 of RFC 4656]. See also Section 4 of RFC 7717." Process comment more for the AD: the YANG doctors reviewed a version of this more than a year ago. Is that typical or would they normally review again during IETF LC?
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [ippm] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-… Mahesh Jethanandani