IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-07

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 September 2017 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62857132D8F; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FphHJYCljAGk; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C4B132713; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id r85so22479126ywg.1; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RijMMvPcFn2hYePLmZEklfxfmht9+BJ1/Wu+kW0dUJs=; b=u4oM8lhE6zpNjBVCcgFJM4VEjjTkopW7wz44UEOxv1s9YRRQ3Y7CFFbyOxo0MATUks yXPAHo1Jgw3tY3qMkcvJte+dbZolMcTw60IGBBcMEQaPIZ0RkNXInq625S9usz8VU5NT PhWFV5yBCbk6oeTZ9XZM9GAjrut50VM0CysHONT4lTjfAhdoIPAt8eOHxH0QZ/oNrbTg yZB+XvIj2MFwTkwHI1fhaDu2nlqyt2Y9qinAecfR8C1hPWHMps/JFdR4ka3BFp1KaHae jHDRtrHyL2fba/cSNXe+Mh9xllOpbQh5cH/mklYMX9LvoaVVWvK19FPG67s91Ta3eu9H 693w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RijMMvPcFn2hYePLmZEklfxfmht9+BJ1/Wu+kW0dUJs=; b=ogVaPnffqgtjRUfoZZdzkHbLaC5LaWgRaKI33MqB7SHHcuWLYT3+MhKlCqdZcwFI59 phNIfvOmhx31Pzvdkv7xKjVA3SUFlB3tvw5U2pTV7mNnplVtCM8900eMx/+jmjw+AZHJ OAyfjT78ON2+48BdJPioufqJ5BUga3WeHI2I6uK91HrTQIh8Sej5E0cuoYZvUPostMG1 0SEG/vg6ydX9/0ODPagBXqpTO9hrvbZ0dYe1iMGScyBW7lvzrH6cPwA6QKx4e/qgl8Si dNvcugPp3Lx+nkNp9/2Zy1oRXxS+AoeC9z59YUBoEqrjuHm0mMFT2pNRCyeBym9Gyc52 J8zg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiGRyBARakpaRdRsxN5OjkfWevK/tAwXe79bQKn4huhIH7/AjZH 9BWlQ4ujr8bcKRzC3gLK91iXN5rsUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5tclfXmbOep+t9YuZdnvJCHO701xJYVvO+MFk/su8O/QIvBAGpCANqqoRWRPPVMTMduu/Q0AO0HFWSPwzMMeU=
X-Received: by 10.129.82.73 with SMTP id g70mr10586716ywb.218.1505145323035; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.2.15 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 08:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DA2892F2-353B-419F-A414-2184EBEF15E9@cisco.com>
References: <CAKKJt-fNBLbG5z+5tWW4168C-ZP4G30akBppcR2dh9HdhSbLsg@mail.gmail.com> <932fdc3890b942098f0791315d6d1feb@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <CAKKJt-eSaW4qGLN87KNm4NeEXuxDGYpAZ_dCynDFzGrvYbDoqg@mail.gmail.com> <4ca6d3654cc2410eae983142200d3707@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <CAKKJt-fCHhnT3REvtPJFJpTG-98LXYhediDe9JSSSOc04e8ZuA@mail.gmail.com> <8EF357EC-AFC4-47F1-938A-E198A5EB7289@cisco.com> <08d3f4eb64a747dab6ad69eb36c67b36@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <DA2892F2-353B-419F-A414-2184EBEF15E9@cisco.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:55:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cBQSkPFft_dSHeuR8vqnz0kcQb1nWLoz1+C_xOTwqyuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>, "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark.shepherd@ietf.org>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148a98450a40b0558ebf4e5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/TevahWke0rfQQlwK29ywTPKWKzg>
Subject: Re: [ippm] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-07
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 15:55:25 -0000

Hi, Carlos,

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

> Thank you, Giuseppe. I reviewed this and, with the exception of the
> unavoidable discussion on authors/editors/contributors that Spencer brought
> up, looks good and seems to address all issues and suggestions.
>

Giuseppe has updated the editor list and posted -10. Could you add the
explanation we discussed about why there are more than 5 authors to the
Working Group Summary, and let me know when you've done that? I'll request
IETF Last Call at that point.

And thanks,

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email