Re: [ippm] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-07

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Wed, 13 September 2017 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBC4132949; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NNOGqUWg-mN6; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBAE13321F; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5610; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505318273; x=1506527873; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=2UwCzq48H5jsqlDeutEFko6HvISCgTdTVsTcKDfPjZE=; b=Q0cYITS1jMsqceYghDc7b8w6KSzT/nqXW3+cRgQnUbvfAZxN9l6na0EX yEbYmkeqg8uLdbl2a/1Luq8i5ycfKSu1p41lnOca89/ubKrXzAcTZJN+b uxvKBylmg2+1S5gb+03IhlWRz0H/96bvPGcEFbC/IBrodWJVepjrNVR0J A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ArAgDcVLlZ/40NJK1RDBkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJva4F5B4NwmkaKL4guh1EKhT4CGoQ7VwECAQEBAQECayiFGQYdBlYQAgEIBDsDAgICHxEUEQIEDgWJTUwDFa09gicnhwwNg2wBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgyuCAoFQgg6CfYE8gRyBYAGDUjCCMQWYN4gGPAKPWoR3knSMV4gsAhEZAYE4AVeBDXcVShIBhRKBd3aKUIEPAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,388,1500940800"; d="scan'208,217";a="2973475"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Sep 2017 15:57:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8DFvp6o029658 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:57:52 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:57:51 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:57:51 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>, "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark.shepherd@ietf.org>, "ippm-chairs@ietf.org" <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark@ietf.org>, "ippm@ietf.org" <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-07
Thread-Index: AQHTJGbz78Z2zHKBGUuLesudYz8HZKKlEF0AgAAD9QCAAZmzAIAADP+AgAGqyoCAAT8jgP//xt2AgAa7MQCAAyVaAA==
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:57:50 +0000
Message-ID: <4B4CFF8D-79F6-459F-BF7F-991450A8D2CD@cisco.com>
References: <CAKKJt-fNBLbG5z+5tWW4168C-ZP4G30akBppcR2dh9HdhSbLsg@mail.gmail.com> <932fdc3890b942098f0791315d6d1feb@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <CAKKJt-eSaW4qGLN87KNm4NeEXuxDGYpAZ_dCynDFzGrvYbDoqg@mail.gmail.com> <4ca6d3654cc2410eae983142200d3707@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <CAKKJt-fCHhnT3REvtPJFJpTG-98LXYhediDe9JSSSOc04e8ZuA@mail.gmail.com> <8EF357EC-AFC4-47F1-938A-E198A5EB7289@cisco.com> <08d3f4eb64a747dab6ad69eb36c67b36@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <DA2892F2-353B-419F-A414-2184EBEF15E9@cisco.com> <CAKKJt-cBQSkPFft_dSHeuR8vqnz0kcQb1nWLoz1+C_xOTwqyuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-cBQSkPFft_dSHeuR8vqnz0kcQb1nWLoz1+C_xOTwqyuw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.241.123]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4B4CFF8D79F6459FBF7F991450A8D2CDciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/TndeulbaTOxCPGulVMDwiun2gaE>
Subject: Re: [ippm] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-07
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:57:54 -0000

Hi, Spencer,

Done — write-up updated, under WG Summary. Check it out, and ship it if you like it.

Thanks a lot!

—
Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com<mailto:carlos@cisco.com>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."

On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi, Carlos,

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <cpignata@cisco.com<mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>> wrote:
Thank you, Giuseppe. I reviewed this and, with the exception of the unavoidable discussion on authors/editors/contributors that Spencer brought up, looks good and seems to address all issues and suggestions.

Giuseppe has updated the editor list and posted -10. Could you add the explanation we discussed about why there are more than 5 authors to the Working Group Summary, and let me know when you've done that? I'll request IETF Last Call at that point.

And thanks,

Spencer