[ippm] 回复：Re: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
mikey_he <xiaoming-he@foxmail.com> Thu, 21 December 2023 11:36 UTC
Return-Path: <xiaoming-he@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E887C0900B6 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 03:36:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_FM_NAME_IP_HOSTN=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yDbH2kyUyITe for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 03:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out203-205-221-210.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-210.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83873C090371 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 03:36:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1703158581; bh=xetZ3A+XfVNvW0CyaJYHNiAa2hrVVoSEfP54hnl838I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=DKdAwHn0Ac5+8yPE2LFV8U1y7k4/abVZmyqFMDm6B1Lr0/OXmWliVXQCusBW8MrUr aXqaomzWxkSUf8cMVz/Q8Y2hfASHhT/YGxd/mI8JE9U66rOaqMSvSUO9PXtRkv/hyc Sg+6prCR6IjrulbUZYn0UW+MIiU9xR8cDrdrS7N4=
X-QQ-XMRINFO: Nq+8W0+stu50PRdwbJxPCL0=
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NMXiAFG25ildSSGQrm6pXtx4+fYQUBTDVCDeScBkoMgVlueGB+GLPrw55g9v+6 10w8lqqm/T6RfUSqmqXtkCCHCE2ykhjKyrwJF6m3Sm8rxYLGiW7i6Nu6PIkgBHkFiprCxDqLylApX 6xAmDhsnMA0D/kWLqvWyzWcgzmP3SHFbTz16P6wEtBqu0lL5kRVyNew5Pmt30zldGVG1WSaObAsB+ kEqlpkjH/pIlpOQ5HPKul3OJ10RZ/kNVNbz1X1qClCkQlvIyzsWmH75tejtjSJWkBKejrRThqxGrV +CnHBkgW4h9UimWIqwJukARiq6lhL36ZZZFFf+2PYQ2ZAVR8rtgifjzYFh0Z5SaF4JmpFasbYyPDH I54ND1elCn+OmlqUaIE1ScHdM+hdcbgOWx8TIslVOIplNmKic/UQZ+7vN1sRC49/d1dbbflVM7Ojd b4EMGwXqEvIYCwp0lsUYWU3EC/+4I85xDyPtDm2mzrgZ0wfTfylKjmN2vuD7DBPAJaHCnqBPyfCvN ag0iKRDFRXpb208xfRNacUNkdaNNB7gdSi77CcKc7e3N0P6oUOexr+JbNx0F9C3JD0E4y/Gv1rDR5 9aTCLSQKYQGCI4lTBurZfcSpoR+LargNZkgZygt9NKmrnVix6RpDy6gcomAA87W9ApA2SPM4ikAfI l70nUdD/Vu5Gbo39cWOYh6wJVtBxxdGTnSM0Kh7EZyneG7Dsf0hvZwz/MJTPeLCPHLXg3Px9R5gNL 4bgyH12u2mSp1Pu95zE041KZymNgyVG34uXfbxYZg07d/vGy8k4T2xAOTdOAzrTH20vRnsyHiK4ps KKfoOCR1fIsZDD1Ib54Af4S0GNg3Mwr/E6ql3io70MtJa5y/jnXXIkWxQQBliBB4mRFSAJmvhUPSo QdYbcmPaFQEbo5DVCnoeup4vD45MkQMfpMkLqWmB84=
From: mikey_he <xiaoming-he@foxmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_658421C8_3CAD0CF0_2169DA26"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 19:30:16 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_1DE3ACA9F3650361F6BF1B8EB325219D1808@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-mid: xmseszc3-0t1703158216te0764ew6
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/XRe8AXpoJrAah9Y0NY2nS801VzM>
Subject: [ippm] 回复：Re: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:29:32 -0000
Hi, IPPM WG, The Alternate-Marking method has been widely depolyed in Opertor networks. I support the adoption of this draft. Regards, Xiaoming He China telecom On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:33 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Hello IPPM, At IETF 118, we discussed adopting the informational draft "Alternate Marking Deployment Framework”, which supplements RFC 9341 and RFC 9342 with deployment considerations. This email starts a working group adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01, that will last until Friday, December 22. Please review the document and provide feedback on whether or not you think IPPM should adopt this work, along with any comments on the document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01 Best, Tommy & Marcus _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm