[ippm] 回复：回复：Re: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
Xiaoming He <xiaoming-he@foxmail.com> Thu, 21 December 2023 14:17 UTC
Return-Path: <xiaoming-he@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A23C151079 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:17:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQ7eyIOibpEB for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:17:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out162-62-58-216.mail.qq.com (out162-62-58-216.mail.qq.com [162.62.58.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4570C14CE5F for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 06:17:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1703168241; bh=Wh+DwrElaVE6YBfVJ7C+RQ339T/daDkQlbeR5hDM5E4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=f78ePED4B6keKpbkJLFpq7416bDouBHM5H2Fty/G5K4cOFuApgI2SgQhWu3LDvHOv dCc6ecqo4kttNBjefLdfKg3t+NhQM6qPf3NLqvumvIJl4Na5NYcRE7CQeJQ4jjkTQE M1AifEGxcifIKfc//bRcf2kHT+NyvEHtbe6ZMA7I=
X-QQ-XMRINFO: NS+P29fieYNw95Bth2bWPxk=
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: M1eBIME5pxciO5AHKax1m+3dJbsBy2VOjVCPtQ07GXw5Y9KwSCS7PeBek+N/WH rrNLG7gUzwk1JLMWLPKAPJ3FIpc0tN/A/TvMgdYTLgMfzeQ4eQUOqv+2KN2Lq9SlwNZ9qRULEn9pm B/kffsMyXo0wzEhh7O2IUg2QYUxUsrOGW9M9C9ELqek79YbcElz1IwN85i24et0g49LKiSbZPzTHY v8G+L88lO1cmIuS7I+sd6ggb/0CAv1Wmej6WEM4QyDYlt3AE2WgaIUCIjHRLIn7+TEjquzYgdnrag 4xq1C5HgoUw3sxTlry2BUxiZuDxfNy193iu+g5Ti8J33mpS3NhcZ2BNb2KrfC0Dt0/4OsdIgFydg0 etB7O0kTZyc0AUM3kzpUWh/LkmyWH3XaybP1SB6jT04nmGBPQXstbQ7VOHOWGdvvP7zBaaKCadQa+ nqRct2pu9u+Axb7uUZKOWJAHeZrscfamKpzzLgmJb5i9NCis9wFWZHAvaKbBXi62r4KKkXaVw5YdG pRaAfphii+zukRSttfklLOpWIS8gEuu5bCGOLk8L7iFrwZ5WvAoABY2+NOKDvhtrf0my4IYmkXW/2 yM47g5VM9oP538V/L2mPaIX0R9KM4krn3BzLvlqfrqQ0oisu92HZ04UforOTf25cBNSfVjiFcBlPr OX136QF7rstbQSX2xQJpbe6eEnvwCZoisPhpLuYFRO0TrbPGLtXslLupf8SQN6ZeJCZuTriEfddZN jeGK90CXYmQ9V8sTl5wedd9Oorm55otSxzGoP2sMCPp5xm8+usxVC0eKD4M5vtu2CUlmF/p0KE2Ry viAOyKOT+OwusZp5l+mQ7E9lO93Cslfu8nU5GLgpoZSox+JHqF+EYjm8REEenXvQIqh6s+4ZDS3pH hvKaVMs+FdbFQJY4GxRFfYMackMkd8jbzY1dVOxHNexP5+cSapKtP8GXaNXxVq2DWIL3LvrdffPVc 9F8iCSwV3wyec/KvHxW+4ymbvybcQ=
From: Xiaoming He <xiaoming-he@foxmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_658448F0_3A278510_1440B091"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 22:17:20 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_CC07838BF56F9E6C60CE9E67E371D626A405@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-mid: xmseszc3-0t1703168240t5kh47l0d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/xl1FclHaDu5-zqXsL9qisH0iIPQ>
Subject: [ippm] 回复：回复：Re: WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:17:36 -0000
Hi, IPPM WG, The Alternate-Marking method has been depolyed in Opertor networks. I support the adoption of this draft. Regards, Xiaoming He China telecom On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:33 AM Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Hello IPPM, At IETF 118, we discussed adopting the informational draft "Alternate Marking Deployment Framework”, which supplements RFC 9341 and RFC 9342 with deployment considerations. This email starts a working group adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01, that will last until Friday, December 22. Please review the document and provide feedback on whether or not you think IPPM should adopt this work, along with any comments on the document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01 Best, Tommy & Marcus _______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm