[ippm] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-04.txt

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Mon, 19 November 2007 13:39 UTC

Return-path: <ippm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iu6qL-0001Oo-Mf; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:39:17 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iu6qK-0001Of-Ha for ippm@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:39:16 -0500
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com ([216.82.241.195]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iu6qH-0000qs-5f for ippm@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:39:16 -0500
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: acmorton@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1195479551!19909463!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.53]
Received: (qmail 5600 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 13:39:12 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.53) by server-14.tower-121.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Nov 2007 13:39:12 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAJDdB25014476 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:39:11 -0500
Received: from mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com [144.155.224.139]) by mlph073.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAJDdAQ6014463 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:39:10 -0500
Received: from sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAJDd9sv001025 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:39:10 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAJDd3um000851 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:39:03 -0500
Message-Id: <200711191339.lAJDd3um000851@mlph070.sfdc.sbc.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (acmt.mt.att.com[135.16.251.73](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20071119133903gw10010gnbe>; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:39:03 +0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:36:27 -0500
To: ippm@ietf.org
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Cc:
Subject: [ippm] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org >
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org >
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org

FYI - we didn't change the filename on this new charter work item,
except to increment the version number.

There have been substantial changes and additions to this draft that
address many comments on the list from August and September.
The slide deck will summarize what was said and what was done.

Also, the authors have added new material on their own initiative,
as a result of their on-going discussions.

>From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
>Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:40:02 -0500
>
>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>directories.
>
>         Title           : Packet Delay Variation Applicability Statement
>         Author(s)       : A. Morton, B. Claise
>         Filename        : draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-04.txt
>         Pages           : 38
>         Date            : 2007-11-18
>
>Packet delay variation metrics appear in many different standards
>documents.  The metric definition in RFC 3393 has considerable
>flexibility, and it allows multiple formulations of delay variation
>through the specification of different packet selection functions.
>
>Although flexibility provides wide coverage and room for new ideas,
>it can make comparisons of independent implementations more
>difficult.  Two different formulations of delay variation have come
>into wide use in the context of active measurements.  This memo
>examines a range of circumstances for active measurements of delay
>variation and their uses, and recommends which of the two forms is
>best matched to particular conditions and tasks.
>
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morton-ippm-delay-var-as-04.txt


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm