Re: [ippm] Heads up on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Hi Bo,
thank you for your quick response to my comment and clarification. The
updates fully address my comments.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 5:46 AM Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the comments. STAMP referenced as RFC 8762 has been added as
> one of PM measurement protocol.
>
> Please be aware this model is a network model and does not specifies the
> details of STAMP.
>
> Please check whether rev-08 addresses your concerns:
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-08
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bo
>
> *From:* Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 4, 2022 4:54 AM
> *To:* Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> *Cc:* IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>; opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ippm] Heads up on draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm
>
>
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> thank you for bringing this work to my attention. I've read and shared my
> comments earlier. The authors responded promptly and we've worked together
> to address my comments. After reading the current version I have a question
> about the importance of identifying the particular active measurement
> protocol used to measure the reported performance metrics. If reporting the
> protocol used for the performance measurement is deemed essential to
> characterize the accuracy of the measurement method, then I would propose
> to consider several additions to the model:
>
> ·         adding STAMP described in RFCs 8762 and 8972 to the list of
> active measurement methods
>
> ·         adding Error Estimate for Session-Sender and
> Session-Reciever/Session-Reflector for OWAMP, TWAMP, and STAMP
>
> Thank you for your kind consideration.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:48 PM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm the document shepherd for draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm. It has
> completed WG last call in the OPSAWG.
>
> The work may be of interest to IPPM and you might want to watch out for the
> IETF last call which will be along in due course.
>
> But I'm sure that the authors would welcome any comments you have at any
> time.
>
> Best,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>
>