IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state

Li Cong <licong@chinatelecom.cn> Wed, 30 March 2022 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <licong@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8343B3A157C for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FWgq7C5_bHaX for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.228]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3ECD3A157A for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 01:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.218:52458.1576168879
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.77 (unknown [172.18.0.218]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 2AD792800E8 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:47:13 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 71080549@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.218]) by app0025 with ESMTP id 01a69fd10a914c609d4dc4ac2d360b5a for ippm@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:47:14 CST
X-Transaction-ID: 01a69fd10a914c609d4dc4ac2d360b5a
X-Real-From: licong@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.218
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: licong@chinatelecom.cn
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22031300
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:47:11 +0800
From: Li Cong <licong@chinatelecom.cn>
To: ippm@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CD99892A-1F45-4259-BD11-65FFF859B971@chinatelecom.cn>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state
References: <202203301520178285923@chinatelecom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202203301520178285923@chinatelecom.cn>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3731503633_4057207318"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/hnUrJepPuKwIQO2YmznKxxWhlyE>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:47:22 -0000

Hi WG and Chairs,

 

I support adoption of this draft.

I think it gives a useful mechanism in IOAM domain.

 

Cheers,

Cong Li

 

原始邮件

发件人：MarcusIhlar

收件人：ippm@ietf.org;

日 期 ：2022年03月30日 01:04

主 题 ：[ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

Hello IPPM,

This email starts the working group last call for the document draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-03

 

Please provide your feedback on whether you think this document is ready to progress by replying to this email by Tuesday, April 12.

 

Best Regards,

Marcus & Tommy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email