IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01

Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr> Wed, 13 December 2023 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F84C14F5F8 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:53:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH=2.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0udVj4cBUTBQ for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:53:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpout01-ext2.partage.renater.fr (smtpout01-ext2.partage.renater.fr [194.254.240.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69D1EC14F5E9 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 17:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr (zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr [194.254.240.26]) by smtpout10.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5A666BA9; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:53:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F29980012; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:53:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582CE80076; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:53:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id WgyTFilBDTqD; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:53:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 150.100.50.54 (unknown [194.254.241.250]) by zmtaauth03.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A78E380012; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 02:53:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
Message-Id: <D3A7EE77-5EF8-4C7E-80D3-9FCA093D7299@insa-lyon.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_25E2084D-01D8-4DD5-8C71-BC9B9E8DC5DE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:53:16 +0900
In-Reply-To: <5D3E01EC-FFDD-45CE-BE2E-F37F8FA796B2@apple.com>
Cc: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <5D3E01EC-FFDD-45CE-BE2E-F37F8FA796B2@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at clamav03
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamState: clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamScore: -100
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrudelhedggedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecutffgpfetvffgtfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffktgggufffjgevvfhfofesrgdtmherhhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlvgigucfjuhgrnhhgucfhvghnghcuoegrlhgvgidrhhhurghnghdqfhgvnhhgsehinhhsrgdqlhihohhnrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeeggeevteffiedtueeukeduiedvveehfeeltdfhieetkeetgffhkeegtdfhheefnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudelgedrvdehgedrvdeguddrvdehtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduleegrddvheegrddvgedurddvhedtpdhhvghlohepudehtddruddttddrhedtrdehgedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeetlhgvgicujfhurghnghcuhfgvnhhguceorghlvgigrdhhuhgrnhhgqdhfvghnghesihhnshgrqdhlhihonhdrfhhrqedpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepvddprhgtphhtthhopehtphgruhhlhiepgedtrghpphhlvgdrtghomhesughmrghrtgdrihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepihhpphhmsehivghtfhdrohhrgh
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/jEgCe5jfHIfQ2ZckbQfLBhDXSn8>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WG adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:53:38 -0000

Dear IPPM,

I support adoption of this document. I have always found “deployment” drafts grouping all the different related works to a technology very useful.

Cheers,
Alex

> On 6 Dec 2023, at 02:33, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello IPPM,
> 
> At IETF 118, we discussed adopting the informational draft "Alternate Marking Deployment Framework”, which supplements RFC 9341 and RFC 9342 with deployment considerations.
> 
> This email starts a working group adoption call for draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01, that will last until Friday, December 22.
> 
> Please review the document and provide feedback on whether or not you think IPPM should adopt this work, along with any comments on the document.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-fz-ippm-alt-mark-deployment-01
> 
> Best,
> Tommy & Marcus
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status