Re: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6925)

[t petch <[e-mail]>]

On 06/04/2022 14:34, MORTON JR., AL wrote:
> Removing Jesus Alvarado <[e-mail]> and the ippm list:
>
> This is wholly BS.  The text does not exist in RFC 6673, and the Note at the bottom doesn't belong anywhere...
>
> Please delete all records of this Errata!

Al

I do not know if you know but this has been going on for a while on a 
number of IETF WG lists.  There has been a discussion of it on the 
RFC-Interest list and I expect they will introduce a CAPTCHA soon.  Also 
under consideration is asking authors of an Erratum to sign up because 
their text needs to come under the IETF IPR rules so they need to be 
aware of 'Note Well'.

The aim is unclear.  As yet no pattern has been detected.  If it is just 
to cause a nuisance, then they are succeeding just fine and this e-mail 
will be helping them:-(  The figures are small, as yet, and I usually 
see the RFC Editor acting before anyone else does.

Tom Petch

> Al
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ippm <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2022 9:49 PM
>> To: MORTON JR., AL <[e-mail]>; [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: [ippm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6673 (6925)
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6673,
>> "Round-Trip Packet Loss Metrics".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-
>> editor.org/errata/eid6925__;!!BhdT!lXxswbI41b1Z6xth91KntYZanokEyKOliL9b91y4mXZ
>> iDYrikhccpkmyzgwjICBO8I3ueao8-4KWKo-70Lrp$
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Jesus Alvarado <[e-mail]>
>>
>> Section: 6673
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> Original Text:
>>
>> RFC 5378                   RFC 3978-incoming               November 2008
>>
>> Corrected Text:
>>
>> RFC 5378             Rights Provided to IETF Trust         November 2008
>>
>> Notes:
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> Original Text:
>>
>> RFC 5378                   RFC 3978-incoming               November 2008
>>
>> Corrected Text:
>>
>> RFC 5378             Rights Provided to IETF Trust         November 2008
>>
>> Notes: That’s contract was before media line’s
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> And again if Danielle is around I am not trying to connect and we do need to
>> talk about what I asked 2012 and you should not be forced into sex until the
>> contract for 2015 is fixed.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6673 (draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-05)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Round-Trip Packet Loss Metrics
>> Publication Date    : August 2012
>> Author(s)           : A. Morton
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : IP Performance Measurement
>> Area                : Transport
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ippm mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm__;!!Bhd
>> T!lXxswbI41b1Z6xth91KntYZanokEyKOliL9b91y4mXZiDYrikhccpkmyzgwjICBO8I3ueao8-
>> 4KWKlkC2w9X$
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>