Re: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Tue, 10 May 2022 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5E9C157B5B for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPgiwKa62Q3u for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFB6C157B58 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2022 01:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Ky9Xy1SQpz67QNS; Tue, 10 May 2022 16:04:02 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 10 May 2022 10:06:53 +0200
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Tue, 10 May 2022 10:06:52 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis
Thread-Index: AQHYW0XyMJ/1oiWUrUajkuT9IvTzLq0X0SdA
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 08:06:52 +0000
Message-ID: <72b52351a827444db44e532879143150@huawei.com>
References: <D1D85EBC-466F-49C9-80BE-60616DC79771@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1D85EBC-466F-49C9-80BE-60616DC79771@apple.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.196.70]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_72b52351a827444db44e532879143150huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/sR4AsN-8_IUpx5Ri4Fhxjyqlsgw>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 08:07:11 -0000

Hi All,
I support their publication as coauthor!

These documents are needed as normative references in related standards track protocol documents.


Regards,

Giuseppe

From: ippm <ippm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tommy Pauly
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2022 11:20 PM
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] WGLC for RFC8321bis and RFC8889bis

Hello IPPM,

This email starts a working group last call for draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis and draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis. As a reminder, these are documents that are being revised as they move from being experimental to standards-track, for which we are running an accelerated process.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8321bis/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis/

Please provide feedback and reviews by replying to this email by Friday, May 13. Please also indicate if you think this document is ready to progress.

Best,
Tommy & Marcus