[ippm] comments on draft-ietf-ippm-reordering-11.txt
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de> Fri, 31 March 2006 15:22 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FPLS3-0004zV-4v; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:22:15 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FPL1G-0002fu-BB for ippm@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:54:34 -0500
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.40]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FPL1F-0005oW-R9 for ippm@ietf.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:54:34 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14ADB200C946; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:54:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00599-03; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:54:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from venus.office (europa.netlab.nec.de [10.1.1.25]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FA0200C945; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:54:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from n-eggert.office ([10.1.1.112]) by venus.office over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:54:32 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n-eggert.office (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADC47B4DF2; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:54:30 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <E1FO2Rj-0008Pd-Dq@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
References: <E1FO2Rj-0008Pd-Dq@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3)
Message-Id: <75952C3E-FBFE-4EBE-BF18-A70D8419233E@netlab.nec.de>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:54:23 +0200
To: ippm@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2006 14:54:32.0706 (UTC) FILETIME=[0519FE20:01C654D3]
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 87a3f533bb300b99e2a18357f3c1563d
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:22:13 -0500
Cc:
Subject: [ippm] comments on draft-ietf-ippm-reordering-11.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org >
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org >
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org ?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0873917537=="
Errors-To: ippm-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, I just realized I hadn't sent my comments on draft-ietf-ippm- reordering-11.txt yet. I do consider them minor (otherwise I wouldn't have initiated IETF Last Call yet) and they can all be addressed during the final editing cycle. Nice job overall! One thing that does need to be checked is wording related to sequence numbers. The assumption here seems to be that sequence numbers are consecutive integers, because many of the metrics use the fact that NextExp is larger by 1 than the sequence number of the previous packet. However, in some places (e.g., lines 181, 188, 354), other wording such as "monotonically increasing", "incrementing", etc. is used when talking about the characteristics of sequence numbers, which do not quite describe the same property. lines 281-283: Not sure if the statement on "working group's view" should remain, given this is moving towards publication now lines 304-306: don't understand the text in parentheses line 1147-1148: reference DCCP and remove "future", RFC should be out any day now - also, make sure to reference the correct CCID lines 1309-1314: might want to talk about the MSL here, too Editing its: bunch of double references, e.g. line 158: "RFC2119 [RFC2119]" some headings end in a colon (unusual), different headings capitalized differently check use of "affect" and "affects", should be "effects" line 303: s/meet/meets/ lines 352-357: might want to point to the overflow discussion in Section 6 lines 471-473: "Whether.." - not a sentence line 498: reference section number instead of "later" line 528: reference section number instead of section title lines 836-837: s/depend on greatly on/depend greatly on/ line 892: s/in order/in-order/ (other places, too) line 1146: s/half/halve/ (also, sentence starts with a digit) line 1294: s/seconds-worth/seconds worth/ Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
_______________________________________________ ippm mailing list ippm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
- [ippm] Last Call: 'Packet Reordering Metric for I… The IESG
- [ippm] comments on draft-ietf-ippm-reordering-11.… Lars Eggert
- Re: [ippm] Last Call: 'Packet Reordering Metric f… Al Morton
- RE: [ippm] Last Call: 'Packet Reordering Metric f… STEPHAN Emile RD-CORE-LAN