[ippm] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 03 December 2019 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8EF120043; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 05:36:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ietf@wjcerveny.com, ippm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.111.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <157538016129.24887.2744947116420747329.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 05:36:01 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/vFv2GXnB5Y5D0uR2ouBMgFmyFlU>
Subject: [ippm] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 13:36:01 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-22: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. It is quite extensive (I even wonder whether it was useful to indicate the motivations for the registry). There are a couple of COMMENTs below; feel free to ignore them but I would appreciate if you replied. Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 5 -- "interpretable by the user." who is the user in this case? (I have my guess of course but let's try to be clear) Why specifying "implementable by the **software** designer," ? I.e., are HW designers out of scope ? "accurate" is also quite vague Also a couple of nits in the section about ',' or '.' and upper/lower case characters. -- Section 6.1 -- s/will/should/ in "Why this Attempt Will Succeed" ? ;-) -- Section 7 -- The table part below is quite unclear at first and second reading. Worth re-wording ? " Category ------------------ Column | Column | " Or perhaps use a tree form (à la YANG module tree) ? -- Section 7.1..2 -- Probably worth mentioning "such as and not limited to" rather than "such as" ? It is also unclear how the MetricType, Method, ... can be extended. -- Section 11.1.3. -- Should the URL be an https:// one ?
- [ippm] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-i… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [ippm] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ie… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)