[ippm] Andrew Alston's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: (with DISCUSS)
Andrew Alston via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 30 June 2022 06:42 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846B2C15D863; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 23:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Alston via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, tpauly@apple.com, tpauly@apple.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.5.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Andrew Alston <andrew-ietf@liquid.tech>
Message-ID: <165657136653.27894.14747473824166575843@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 23:42:46 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/vzmoQzjJ9eNyqiOYmUkXnZEU2lg>
Subject: [ippm] Andrew Alston's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 06:42:46 -0000
Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Thanks for the work on this document. While I am supporting the other discusses on this document, I would also like to discuss some of the language in section 8. Specifically: In order to mitigate the performance-related attacks described above, as described in Section 7 it should be possible for IOAM-enabled devices to selectively apply the mechanisms that use the flags defined in this document to a subset of the traffic, and to limit the performance of synthetically generated packets to a configurable rate. Specifically, IOAM nodes should be able to: Considering the serious security considerations in play here - can we consider making the should here a MUST in both the second and final lines of the above.
- [ippm] Andrew Alston's Discuss on draft-ietf-ippm⦠Andrew Alston via Datatracker