[ippm] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for {draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-09}
CC @ekline

## Comments

### S4.1.1

* "if the encapsulating node's identity is not available in
   the encapsulation header"

   Can you say a little more about what circumstances would cause the
   encapsulating node's identity to not be available?  This seemed a
   little surprising to me.

### S4.2

* I think "address of the node performing the copy" should be expanded
  to say that RFC 6724 source address selection MUST apply.

## Nits

### S4.4

* "Specificallly" -> "Specifically"

### S5

* "layer needs not" -> "layer need not"