Re: [Geopriv] IPR Problems - Re: IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements
tsg <tglassey@earthlink.net> Fri, 21 June 2013 19:26 UTC
Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C8F21F9FA8; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGwyzOlHZCrn; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C17821F9A4C; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=FSuOE28HVagUXV9wpfFz/Mqhvozsdcx/IUjBTH8rpZ2WKdQhZwQX3L8LuD3hoGrM; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [67.180.133.21] (helo=[192.168.1.102]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1Uq6yf-0001br-5I; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:26:33 -0400
Message-ID: <51C4A8E7.7060300@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:26:31 -0700
From: tsg <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] IPR Problems - Re: IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements
References: <C57CC6D4-89A8-436A-8664-55BD3E7E5DAF@cdt.org> <51C4A336.2010500@earthlink.net> <CAL02cgQGhT79P4iDT3KbnfM6xvndPhAYJ-iTykSs-qSMXJsW2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQGhT79P4iDT3KbnfM6xvndPhAYJ-iTykSs-qSMXJsW2g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050406040006020109050307"
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79800ff337d95706d25b5a958cd583581a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 67.180.133.21
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipr-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:26:48 -0000
On 06/21/2013 12:06 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Hi Todd, > > If you believe your patent (or any other) is relevant to this > document, please file a disclosure against the document in the tracker. > > Thanks, > --Richard Richard - my apologies to the GeoPRIV group My only point was that IETF's IPR system can and should allow a single IPR filing to be linked across any number of IPR events and I-D or RFC filings. Todd > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:02 PM, tsg <tglassey@earthlink.net > <mailto:tglassey@earthlink.net>> wrote: > > On 06/21/2013 07:34 AM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > > Dear GEOPRIV, > > Several IPR disclosures were filed against a GEOPPRIV > document, draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements, which is now > in IESG review: > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_document_tag=draft-ietf-geopriv-held-measurements>. > Please send comments to the list by Friday, 28 June if you > have concerns related to these IPR disclosures. > > Thanks, > Alissa > _______________________________________________ > Geopriv mailing list > Geopriv@ietf.org <mailto:Geopriv@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > > Folks > > The IPR system is an issue - there are already numerous IPR > filings which would clearly apply to this same filing and the need > to formally update them or add new IPR linkages is an issue. Mine > for instance relative to our rights on the shared-use US6370629 > patent. > > Todd Glassey > > > -- > // Standard "perasonal email" disclaimers apply > > _______________________________________________ > Geopriv mailing list > Geopriv@ietf.org <mailto:Geopriv@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > > -- // Standard "perasonal email" disclaimers apply