IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETf permissions distinct from permissions given to the world

Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Mon, 07 March 2005 16:54 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07557 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:54:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D8LXY-00005Z-MK for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:57:08 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D8LTs-00027z-OG; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:53:20 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D8LTr-00027q-KG for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:53:19 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07411 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:53:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D8LW3-0008UR-CP for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:55:37 -0500
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2005 08:55:31 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,143,1107763200"; d="scan'208"; a="165552872:sNHT4830512544"
Received: from cisco.com (ssh-sjc-1.cisco.com [171.68.225.134]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j27Gr0TM008858; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:53:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:52:50 -0500
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20050307165249.GB4032@sbrim-w2k02>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
References: <tslpsybs986.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <tslpsybs986.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETf permissions distinct from permissions given to the world
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 11:37:29AM -0500, Sam Hartman allegedly wrote:
> I pointed out what I believe will be some significant problems if we
> ever want to change our IPR rights granted to the world.  I
> suggested that perhaps we should require sufficiently broad rights
> from authors that we do not need to have huge quantities of IPR
> state associated with each document.

Sam, could you be specific?  Once upon a time there were big
discussions about what rights authors were willing to give to
IETF/ISOC, leading to the default statement (and other possible
statements).  The "copying" part of the extracts draft is repair text
to express the policy that is working code.  If you are talking about
the "modification" part, then if the IETF agrees on evolving it, it
will become policy.  What other rights do you have in mind?

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email