A suggested additional item in IPR disclosure pages
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 26 October 2004 10:57 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA22898 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 06:57:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMPFB-0000H3-Sg for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:12:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMP0g-000200-Ax; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 06:57:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMOtT-0000la-57 for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 06:49:35 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA22165 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 06:49:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMP76-00005W-Pz for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:03:41 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADCD61B96 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:48:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21796-09 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:48:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499DF61C14 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:48:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:10:37 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <E4425408FAC6FAA69935F9E3@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: A suggested additional item in IPR disclosure pages
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, now that the web-form disclosure pages are operational, I'd like to solicit the thoughts of people on the WG mailing list on a possible addition. In RFC 3668 section 6.4.3, the following language occurs: > However, the requirement for an IPR disclosure is > satisfied by a blanket statement of the IPR discloser's willingness > to license all of its potential IPR meeting the requirements of > Section 6.6 (and either Section 6.1.1 or 6.1.2) to implementers of an > IETF specification on a royalty-free basis as long as any other terms > and conditions are disclosed in the IPR disclosure statement. The term "any other terms and conditions are disclosed" seems like a nice thing to know under any circumstance, both for generic and specific IPR disclosures. So the suggestion came up to add a checkbox to the template, with the following accompanying text: > "The individual submitting this template represents and warrants that all > other terms and conditions that must be satisfied for implementers of an > IETF specification to obtain a license on a royalty-free basis have been > disclosed in this IPR disclosure statement This should go into the generic template, since 3668 explicitly says that the IETF treats disclosures for which this is true different from disclosures for which it is not. But I also think it would be good to put it into the specific template - to allow people to get around the FUD generated by someone saying "but we don't know what OTHER terms might be imposed upon us when we ask for a license" in the case where the IPR holder REALLY wants things to be simple. Makes sense? _______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
- A suggested additional item in IPR disclosure pag… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: A suggested additional item in IPR disclosure… scott bradner
- Re: A suggested additional item in IPR disclosure… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: A suggested additional item in IPR disclosure… scott bradner