Boilerplate text

["Bill Fenner" <[e-mail]>]

I'm trying to apply the boilerplate text to a 1id-guidelines update.
Was the word "the" left off between the copyright year and "IETF
Trust" on purpose?  i.e., is "Copyright 2008 IETF Trust and Bill
Fenner.  All rights reserved." the intended usage?

Here is a new section 3 for 1id-guidelines:

3.  IPR-Related Notices Required in Internet-Drafts

   All Internet-Drafts must have the following intellectual property
   rights (IPR) and copyright statements on the first page:

   "This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF pursuant to, and in full
   conformance with, the provisions of BCP 79.

   Copyright [year] IETF Trust and [the listed authors].  All rights
   reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.

   (See Trust Guidance [TrustGuidance] section 6a. and 6c.)

   [year] in the copyright statement should be replaced by the year of
   publication of the document, and [the listed authors] should be
   replaced by the authors of the document.  Normal english list form
   should be used, e.g., "IETF Trust and A. Nonymous" but "IETF Trust,
   J. Blow and T. Rex".

   Any submission which does not include these statements will be
   returned to the submitter.  The IETF Secretariat will NOT add this
   text.


Is "the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents" the
right way to refer to this document?  Should I refer to it that way in
the parenthetical comment too instead of my shorthand of "Trust
Guidance"?

When I was updating section 4 (which talks about the optional
restrictions in 6b.) I ran across a minor hiccough -- 3978 allows the
6.b.ii. statement, "This document may not be modified, and derivative
works of it may not be created, and it may not be published except as
an Internet-Draft.", to be split into two: "This document may not be
modified, and derivative works of it may not be created." and "This
document may only be posted in an Internet-Draft." are in different
sections of 3978.  The section of 3978 that mentions this also
mentions optionally giving extra permissions for MIBs/PIBs published
with this restriction: "other than to extract section XX as-is for
separate use."

-incoming only mentions that there are instructions in the Legend
Instructions, which I assume are the same as the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents, so I can't really tell from
that whether the wg intentionally removed these options; the trust
intentionally removed these options; the trust unintentionally removed
these options; or other.

Thanks,
  Bill
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg