Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"

Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com> Thu, 14 August 2008 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipr-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878B43A690B; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BCE3A692D for <ipr-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fj2zIs+vqOqZ for <ipr-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDCB3A682F for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so72748qwe.31 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.214.184.3 with SMTP id h3mr1543114qaf.50.1218736148323; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.0.16? ( [68.114.74.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm2040617wrh.6.2008.08.14.10.49.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <C09383D4-AFF6-4D0E-B7DF-FAA93E11863C@fenron.com>
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@fenron.com>
To: Ed Juskevicius <edj@nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D511F9537B@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Subject: Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETF Documents"
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:49:01 -0400
References: <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D511F9537B@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/ipr-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org

On Aug 10, 2008, at 11:58 PM, Ed Juskevicius wrote:
> On behalf of the IETF Trustees, we invite your
> review and final comments and suggestions on this
> policy.

Here's part of an email that I posted last week on the ipr wg list,  
which hasn't received much comment but I would like the trustees to  
consider:

When I was updating section 4 [of 1id-guidelines]
(which talks about the optional
restrictions in 6b.) I ran across a minor hiccough -- 3978 allows the
6.b.ii. statement, "This document may not be modified, and derivative
works of it may not be created, and it may not be published except as
an Internet-Draft.", to be split into two: "This document may not be
modified, and derivative works of it may not be created." and "This
document may only be posted in an Internet-Draft." are in different
sections of 3978.  The section of 3978 that mentions this also
mentions optionally giving extra permissions for MIBs/PIBs published
with this restriction: "other than to extract section XX as-is for
separate use."

-incoming only mentions that there are instructions in the Legend
Instructions, which I assume are the same as the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents, so I can't really tell from
that whether the wg intentionally removed these options; the trust
intentionally removed these options; the trust unintentionally removed
these options; or other.

Thanks,
  Bill
_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg