IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Late IPR disclosures

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 25 June 2022 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CC1C15AD44 for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 14:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.927
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.927 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4x3CcMcnpJvF for <ipr-wg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 14:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A6CC15AAEE for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 14:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 25PLW0FC002603; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:32:00 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDE64604B; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:32:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429AE4603D; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:32:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:32:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (89.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.89] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 25PLVxL6014623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:31:59 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'S Moonesamy' <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, 'John C Klensin' <john-ietf@jck.com>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20220625135518.0e9050b0@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20220625135518.0e9050b0@elandnews.com>
Subject: RE: Late IPR disclosures
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:31:59 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <042801d888db$010a3090$031e91b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQJmjk8nxpZIQ2282R4e4bzCCrgcBKxEmA1A
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.89
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-26978.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--4.554-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--4.554-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-26978.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--4.554000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HXSqh3WYKfvxIbpQ8BhdbAXtykVcrvpNp9XpWXAGZTRdmYC2OKn+sZGp bwaq/OokElsurv9l4YAKeSQ01zbpFj879zET5UZxL7p//vLv4bOS3G9UxpYxsLV5fSMRD1zqbG+ 33FXnD7OLVDMXzEGmRdgt6RJP2/j8RpsoDCmkF1IdZEkR8Y/meaNcO9Rqjuq5m0gr7bSBDjZ8Oh 9OmzIIr+9FZUbZUmFAWqLBUk/Na0sJcF0dzzdhWZ4CIKY/Hg3AtOt1ofVlaoJ1wPk/GHGZAzykS kIruodMdB0ntd9Tzp47AFczfjr/7GBKN7CnqGWi14gBsG/MXE9je1OEnLSUrx67SbSt0Z/6DvfW 0xtgVN0=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipr-wg/omp6SKT7WOxKLT8R29C4nqw_-8w>
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipr-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 21:32:34 -0000

In this particular case, it appears that patent application was filed in the
US on 2021-11-24 and disclosed on 2021-11-26.

However, there was a pre-dating Chinese patent that was applied for on
2018-06-06. I have no access to whether the authors of the document or the
active participants in the WG would have had reason to know about the
Chinese patent.

That should not detract from the point you want to discuss.

A

-----Original Message-----
From: Ipr-wg <ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of S Moonesamy
Sent: 25 June 2022 22:20
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>; ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Late IPR disclosures

Hi John,

I was reading draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark which is currently being 
evaluated by the IESG.  There was an IPR disclosure after the Last 
Call, in addition to the two disclosures which were filed before 
that.  It is not possible for the working group to evaluate 
alternative solutions (Section 5.2 of RFC 8179) when an IPR 
disclosure is filed this late in the process.

Is this another case of too late to fix?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email