Re: draft-savola-ipr-lastcall-01.txt

On Sat, 10 May 2003, todd glassey wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 May 2003, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> > > I like this thinking - and once we get the IPR claims into a database so
> > > that it's mechanical to generate "the list of all IPR claims known to
> > > pertain to this document set", it shouldn't add that much overhead
> either.
> >
> > Indeed, a repository change would make this much easier.
> >
> > > (I wouldn't want to be responsible for doing it today....)
> >
> > Yes, it's a bit difficult, but if you know the draft(s), doing a grep in
> > the IPR repository index and subdirectories should give you a rather good
> > reassurance on this.
> 
> This is too much work for the IETF to have to maintain, further if you are
> maintaining it and any of its wrong - you get this liability.

There is no way around it.

Decisions have been called back for process errors before.  If someone 
notices IESG forgot to add a mention of this later on, the case could be 
revisited.

I don't see how this gives anyone a legal liability.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg