[Ips] ips WG Last Call Complete - Node Architecture Key draft

Black_David@emc.com Mon, 02 October 2006 16:45 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUQuu-0003jM-R7; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:45:20 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUQuu-0003jH-C3 for ips@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:45:20 -0400
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([128.222.32.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUQus-0003wX-0o for ips@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:45:20 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (nagas.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.11]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k92GjFKl009551 for <ips@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:45:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.53]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k92Giaxp003001 for <ips@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:45:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com ([128.221.62.13]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:45:04 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:45:03 -0400
Message-ID: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B6747C@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: ips WG Last Call Complete - Node Architecture Key draft
Thread-Index: AcbmQhvUbaR4SiLfQl6BgRQ31WJ9Sg==
To: ips@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2006 16:45:04.0201 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C339390:01C6E642]
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.10.2.91442
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reason='EMC_BODY_1+ -3, EMC_FROM_0+ -2, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CP_NOT_1 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc: Black_David@emc.com
Subject: [Ips] ips WG Last Call Complete - Node Architecture Key draft
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org

This ips WG Last Call on the following draft is complete:

      Declarative Public Extension Key for iSCSI Node Architecture
                draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-01.txt

The only comments I have on this draft seen are mine, and they're
entirely editorial, so this draft has passed WG Last Call.  The draft
author (Dave Wysochanski) should submit a revised version addressing
all of those comments.  With respect to the following comment:

> The only change I think might not be necessary is the one in Section
4.
> There was an error in the -00 version of the draft, but I think the
-01
> version is ok.
> 
>> Section 4:
>> 
>>    The choice of which countermeasure is most appropriate depends on
the
>>    environment.  However, the first countermeasure may be acceptable
in
>>    many environments, since it provides a compromise between sending
too
>>    much information and the other more complete countermeasures of
not
>>    sending the key at all or using IPsec.
>> 
>> I think this should say 'However, the latter countermeasure'.
Recheck
>> this text with respect to the immediately preceding paragraph in the
>> draft.

What needs to be done is in the last sentence quoted - recheck Section 4
in the next version to make sure this paragraph is consistent with the
previous one.

Please make sure the next version of the draft passes the online ID
Nits Checker at:

	http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/

*before* submitting it in order to avoid being told to resubmit yet
another version that does pass those checks.

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips