Re: [Ips] WG Last Call review: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-01.txt

Dave Wyso <deepthinkingguy@yahoo.com> Fri, 29 September 2006 10:56 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTG31-0003Xt-Di; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:56:51 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTG30-0003XN-Oj for ips@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:56:50 -0400
Received: from web36813.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTG2z-0007Af-Dt for ips@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:56:50 -0400
Received: (qmail 23839 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2006 10:56:48 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KNRkS7wh5vIqdqLWqIpejCdvKxpQecntSXWwhDL8HfQ/WP13CYsE/puYlB69XvAv9vzbr80rz6OSMMiSYJDaHgKV1whMPfhftPbpi23yGkqEIrWWkEHiwpbG/O8ZI602Rsl2LEkaItk1tDvbugdLdCLiY9301dUAhCCYsdNEVDU= ;
Message-ID: <20060929105648.23837.qmail@web36813.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [76.17.122.1] by web36813.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:56:48 PDT
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:56:48 -0700
From: Dave Wyso <deepthinkingguy@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Ips] WG Last Call review: draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-nodearch-key-01.txt
To: Black_David@emc.com, ips@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B67438@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: wysochanski@pobox.com
List-Id: IP Storage <ips.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ips@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips>, <mailto:ips-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org

Thanks.

The only change I think might not be necessary is the one in Section 4.
There was an error in the -00 version of the draft, but I think the -01
version is ok.


> 
> Section 4:
> 
>    The choice of which countermeasure is most appropriate depends on the
>    environment.  However, the first countermeasure may be acceptable in
>    many environments, since it provides a compromise between sending too
>    much information and the other more complete countermeasures of not
>    sending the key at all or using IPsec.
> 
> I think this should say 'However, the latter countermeasure'.  Recheck
> this text with respect to the immediately preceding paragraph in the
> draft.
> 


_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips