Re: Deprecation of AH header from the IPSEC tool kit

Dan Harkins <dharkins@cips.nokia.com> Thu, 15 June 2000 15:33 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA25555; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA05496 Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:40:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200006150444.VAA04179@potassium.network-alchemy.com>
To: Paul Krumviede <paul@mci.net>
cc: Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr@solidum.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: Deprecation of AH header from the IPSEC tool kit
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:44:12 PDT." <3226945962.961004652@sjo-dhcp0386.mcit.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4176.961044259.1@network-alchemy.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:44:19 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@cips.nokia.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:44:12 PDT you wrote
> 
> note that draft-iab-wirelessws-00.txt indicates that
> there was resistance to acceptance of IPv6 in
> "any" of 3G standards efforts (section 3.10).
> it also notes that "there was considerable
> aversion to use of IPsec and IKE protocols
> due to perceived overhead and delay."

It was this same perception that caused many wheels to be
reinvented for WAP. The result is no better, and in some ways
worse, than TCP/IP. WIPSec and WIKE will follow this tradition.

  Dan.