IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecation of AH header from the IPSEC tool kit

Paul Krumviede <paul@mci.net> Thu, 15 June 2000 02:23 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by ns.secondary.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA08353; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA03224 Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:35:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 17:44:12 -0700
From: Paul Krumviede <paul@mci.net>
Subject: Re: Deprecation of AH header from the IPSEC tool kit
In-reply-to: <14664.8103.923043.964046@thomasm-u1.cisco.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr@solidum.com>
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Message-id: <3226945962.961004652@sjo-dhcp0386.mcit.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.0 (Win32)
Content-type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="us-ascii"
Content-disposition: inline
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

--On Wednesday, 14 June, 2000 17:13 -0700 Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com> 
wrote:

>    Are folks over here aware that the cellular
>    folks are requiring ipv6 in next gen handsets,
>    and all that implies for security? This issue is
>    not entirely academic anymore.

note that draft-iab-wirelessws-00.txt indicates that
there was resistance to acceptance of IPv6 in
"any" of 3G standards efforts (section 3.10).
it also notes that "there was considerable
aversion to use of IPsec and IKE protocols
due to perceived overhead and delay."

-paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email