Re: [IPsec] Any reason to meet in Toronto?

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 June 2014 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151091A0167 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 01:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4AW6D9icmu3Q for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 01:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EF0B1A0162 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 01:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u56so6412442wes.9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 01:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mlInr6kq478e++AICS4dLNHmsAsthx6F4a/0/j04kUw=; b=JueYumPhkYXHZ1+IMzTYFMFoM5jJmmV4krvTVxs2G/zbK2rsXDLN22/YfBHzislGon t3DP5ZX6o/ON3To1W8Xt8pXHLY68Jr8G7vR2szVcG/BllthGUZD2FZfrrwhowe6KhseS jmCSRCgnChU5WQ5Pbop++rjHq+ZKmoTSwCos9UNtWud8Amop2JkmtQ1guLjqoJBcdz+h DTCj4U4vB5I3B64gOgIMUphROWtCSsrDaY4iEQCAt+itMrQP4/5n+ZRcABEboBBxhok0 oKO0HXqSlv5dEbuBX7xh6xKS3OoGJd+Gnt5uInfXFWQkgQtj83pYHspaf5T0SxHaJkV/ /Jlw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.8.6 with SMTP id n6mr41424140wja.31.1401784049014; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 01:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.51.131 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 01:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <501287C6-CC21-44BA-80AA-BC38B3722A0E@vpnc.org>
References: <501287C6-CC21-44BA-80AA-BC38B3722A0E@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:27:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CADZyTkn83O0-otTw_AaN_O-OXwWtdyEhC_CA0ipbRq1ZUmMB2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d5cb64b1d6104faea485d"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/1jwEyLcNyXAE7KBgWC7T8D5r36s
Cc: IPsec ME WG List <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Any reason to meet in Toronto?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:27:38 -0000

Hi,

In my case, here are the documents we would like to present:
    - mobikev2 that is an extension of MOBIKE with the transport [1]

We are also working on a few drafts on our Diet-ESP considering the various
feed backs we received. We are still working on them so they have not yet
been published. They should be published by end of June. However, a)
presentation may also be done in other places as we considerably reduces
the modifications on IPsec. b) Although we expect multiple drafts, they are
all related to the same topic DIET-ESP that has already been presented in
London.


[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-ipsecme-mobikev2-00


On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> Greetings again. The WG currently has no documents under active
> discussion. Given that, Yaron and I thought that we don't *have* to meet in
> Toronto. However, at our meetings, we try to let people with IPsec-related
> drafts to make initial presentations. We could have a short meeting to do
> that in Toronto if there are a few documents that (a) have not been
> presented at previous IPsecME WG meetings and (b) are related to IPsec.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>



-- 
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58