Re: [IPsec] Any reason to meet in Toronto?

I've already asked co-chairs for a slot to present null-auth
in a private e-mail.

Valery.

> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
>> Well, there’s my puzzles draft ([1]).
>
> There is also null-auth [2] which I think has not been presented. While
> presenting it would be a one slide presentation, it would be good
> to get this unstuck and have people review it, as I'm waiting on the
> IANA registry code point for this :/
>
>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-ipsecme-puzzles-00
>
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-01
>
>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 1:56 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings again. The WG currently has no documents under active 
>>> discussion. Given that, Yaron and I thought that we don't *have* to meet 
>>> in Toronto. However, at our meetings, we try to let people with 
>>> IPsec-related drafts to make initial presentations. We could have a 
>>> short meeting to do that in Toronto if there are a few documents that 
>>> (a) have not been presented at previous IPsecME WG meetings and (b) are 
>>> related to IPsec.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> --Paul Hoffman
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IPsec mailing list
>>> IPsec@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPsec mailing list
>> IPsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>> 