Re: [IPsec] New draft for address ADVPN (draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-00)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 07 July 2013 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCD021F9D7E for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YGbCqYdaIU9j for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5E121F9C91 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-228.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r672YkpF013819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:34:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CDFE1B10.546AF%praveenys@juniper.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 19:34:46 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <53B91C26-0D0F-4231-96E2-3A4871812EF2@vpnc.org>
References: <CDFE1B10.546AF%praveenys@juniper.net>
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New draft for address ADVPN (draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-00)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 02:34:50 -0000

OK, I'll start. Which of the requirements from draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem do any of the authors believe this proposal meets completely? Adequately? Barely? Not at all?

--Paul Hoffman