IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] New draft for addressing ADVPN (draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-00)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 07 July 2013 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9C521F9D62 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBW2-6nB04ma for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3356B21F9DA9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-228.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r672pOGu014480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:51:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CDFE22C0.546B4%praveenys@juniper.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 19:51:24 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <85C666C9-A2D2-4F27-938E-4CD86D902A22@vpnc.org>
References: <CDFE22C0.546B4%praveenys@juniper.net>
To: Praveen Sathyanarayan <praveenys@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New draft for addressing ADVPN (draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-00)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 02:51:28 -0000

On Jul 6, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Praveen Sathyanarayan <praveenys@juniper.net> wrote:

> We have "Appendix B Comparison Against ADVPN Requirements². This section
> compares draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem this proposed ADVPN protocol. I
> believe, we meet the requirement completely. We welcome your feedback on
> it. 

Sorry, I was being too terse. The appendix lists the requirements, but doesn't say how well the authors think they met or didn't meet each one. Are there requirements you feel that the proposal covers less well than others?

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email