Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecme-camellia-xcbc
Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com> Thu, 17 September 2009 08:36 UTC
Return-Path: <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981343A6830 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.957
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.957 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.642, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4LOSc+Jxl9fu for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35253A67A2 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n8H8apSr028238; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:36:51 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:36:50 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
To: Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI <taddyhatty@nifty.com>, KATO Akihiro <kato.akihiro@po.ntts.co.jp>, "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:36:49 +0300
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecme-camellia-xcbc
Thread-Index: Aco3caQNOPpAyA0nQgOEmVJSVkvbtAAABrCQ
Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC80190AD32821D@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <4AA9DC78.1020403@po.ntts.co.jp><F3DFFC5FB74B4FC98F64230D0F044158@GATEWAY><9A9F31528C0442439EF6A78A1D00209F@GATEWAY> <A46FB6C8B9F14C34BE37F59D3B1D200C@GATEWAY> <9A72673A96B74350B46A3AC49355666D@GATEWAY>
In-Reply-To: <9A72673A96B74350B46A3AC49355666D@GATEWAY>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecme-camellia-xcbc
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:36:03 -0000
Gentlemen, This is way out of scope of the IPsec mailing list. Please take this discussion elsewhere. Best regards, Yaron > -----Original Message----- > From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:34 > To: KATO Akihiro; ipsec@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecme-camellia-xcbc > > > Indeed, the matter is strongly related with theoretical proof of > evolution > > of human intelligence. > > Discussion of "evolution of human intelligence" is indeed a disucussion > about > THE NEXT OF COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION. > // We should NOT let "WIDE" steal "ideas". :-) > > Indeed, it may be possible to combine Accounting with Physics. > > Let's consider about "cost of gravity". > > In modern physics, Electricity and Magnetism are strongly combined > as Electromagnetism. However, Gravity and Electromagnetism have > NOT been combined yet. > > Why couldn't people theoretically combine Gravity with Electromagnetism? > > Because the way of recognition of "cost" behind Gravity is different > from Electricity or Magnetism. It depends upon the history of evolution > of intelligence. > > For a humanity, the phenomenon reminding us some kind of effort can > be recognized as "cost". In other words, any phenomenon reminding us > energy consumption can be recognized as "cost". > > Usually, people don't recognize a kind of "cost" about phenomenon > brought out by Gravity on Earth. In other words, cost of gravity is always > considered as "zero", because any energy consumption can't be recognized. > In our world wide history, Kings, Emperors, Generals and Governments > had NOT been charging or taxing on gravity. > > If the way of recognition is different, they can't be theoretically > combined. > In other words, the way of recognition is same, it is possible to be > theoretically combined. > > This could be the answer for Albert Einstein. I think. > There is a kind of hypothesis by MEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, "every human > being has same structure of intelligence". > > And more, people, dolphins and monkeys are sharing some structures > of intelligence. > > That's why people, dolphins and monkeys could share good time/fun > through gambling. Such public amusement area could be designed > mathematically, I think. > > // We should NOT let "WIDE" steal "ideas of genious" :-) > > taddyhatty@acm.org > > > > > >> A definition of randomness is a definition of a humanity. > > > > Indeed, the matter is strongly related with theoretical proof of > evolution > > of human intelligence. It is evolved from "gambling" to "investment or > > speculation".The matter is an ability of foreseeing. > > > > In order to define "randomness", let's consider the difference of > > investment, > > speculation and gambling. > > > > What is investment? > > Everyone can do investment. It can be automatically done according to > > some kinds of cost accounting theorem. CVP analysis are useful. > > Break even point can be automatically calculated. > > > > What is speculation? > > Speculation can be done by specific people. It will create "randomness" > > in our economiy. It can be explained by a kind of mathematical theorem > > of the "dirrerences of estimations of people". Speculation of human > being > > is the origin of "randomness". > > > > What is gambling? > > Gambling can be done by even monkeys. > > With gambling, people, dolphins and monkeys could share fun. > > That's kind of my hypothesis about evolution of intelligence. > > It is beneficial to plain "public gambling spaces" with people, dolphins > > and monkeys. We can communicate each other through gambling. > > > > The "jongengine" which is a kind of lab. http://www.jongengine.net/ > > The concept of GPL looks like a kind of socialism or communism, > > However if they respect to "invent" not "inventory", they may be > > a kind of democrats. > > > > This was originally planned by MEEEEEEEEEEEEE as a kind of > > Volunteer, when I was an emplyee of Hewlett-Packard. At that time, > > the CEO of HP was Mrs.Carly Fiorina. At that time, I recommend > > local managers the fundamental concept of unconditional obeying to > > "idea of genious" rather than implicit habits or culture or a kind of > > religion. > > > > However many Japanese sales representatives and IT engineer couldn't > > understand the fundamental theorem of "evolution of intelligenc. > > Everybody couldn't emotionally recognize "genious" because everyone > > didn't know how to define a humanity. > > > > After that, I resigned from HP, and joined Sony Corporation. > > However, many IT engineers of sony were also. Nowadays, I resigned > > from Sony Corporation too. > > > > Japanese IT consultants or sales representatives should be fired, I > think. > > They don't have "thought", so they can't promote the evolution of > > civilization. > > > > taddyhatty@acm.org > > > > > >> > >> > >> Without a proof or defitnion of "randomness", why can so many > >> Japanese IT engineers proceed works? > >> > >> Basically, Japanese IT engineers should obey "idea of genious" rather > >> than implicit habits or culture or a kind of religion. > >> > >> If Japanese IT engineers adopted the imported technology to the life of > >> Japanese citizens directly, it could be called as a kind of criminal. > >> Do you recognize that? > >> > >> The method to realize "randomness" is the method to generate > >> unpredictable series that is difficult to be found out characteristics > >> or trends. The mathematical proof have not been provided yet. > >> > >> A definition of randomness is a definition of a humanity. > >> > >> taddyhatty@acm.org > >> > >> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I've posted new revision of draft-kanno-ipsecme-camellia-xcbc. > >>>> > >>>> I summarize modifications. > >>>> > >>>> 1. Added TVs. > >>>> > >>>> Comments about our document would be welcome. > >>>> > >>>> We plan to make this draft to next step 'Publication Request' within > >>>> two > >>>> weeks. > >>>> > >>>> Regards. > >>>> ------------------ > >>>> new version of I-D, draft-kanno-ipsecme-camellia-xcbc-01.txt has been > >>>> successfuly submitted by Akihiro Kato and posted to the IETF > >>>> repository. > >>>> > >>>> Filename: draft-kanno-ipsecme-camellia-xcbc > >>>> Revision: 01 > >>>> Title: The Camellia-XCBC-96 and Camellia-XCBC-PRF-128 Algorithms and > >>>> Its > >>>> Use with IPsec > >>>> Creation_date: 2009-09-09 > >>>> WG ID: Independent Submission > >>>> Number_of_pages: 11 > >>>> > >>>> Abstract: > >>>> This memo specifies two new algorithms. One is the usage of XCBC > >>>> mode with Camellia block cipher on the authentication mechanism of > >>>> the IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload and Authentication Header > >>>> protocols. This algorithm is called Camellia-XCBC-96. Latter is > >>>> pseudo-random function based on XCBC with Camellia block cipher for > >>>> Internet Key Exchange. This algorithm is called Camellia-XCBC-PRF- > >>>> 128. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> The IETF Secretariat. > >>>> > >>>> ------------------ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> - KATO Akihiro > >>>> + NTT Software Corporation > >>>> akato (at) po (dot) ntts (d0t) co (dot) jp move to > >>>> kato (d0t) akihiro (at) po (dot) ntts (d0t) co (dot) jp > >>>> at July 1,2009 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> IPsec mailing list > >>>> IPsec@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> IPsec mailing list > >>> IPsec@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> IPsec mailing list > >> IPsec@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IPsec mailing list > > IPsec@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > > Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.
- Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecm… Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI
- [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecme-ca… KATO Akihiro
- Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecm… Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI
- Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecm… Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI
- Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecm… Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI
- Re: [IPsec] Call for Review on draft-kanno-ipsecm… Yaron Sheffer