IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-05.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 31 March 2015 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3993F1A7021; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h-Wm5H4GMM8G; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD5D1A7002; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t2V0pFED073674 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH7KX6x9rQHTN4M5QB4dZ6vsZ8oAjQYuZooKsqxdgf6xnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:51:14 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A4CA1B96-3AF6-4D5F-9EFE-6794CBC31FBD@vpnc.org>
References: <21780.37200.119692.51021@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <C5AE72F035554A3F9F02F7C283C536C4@buildpc> <CAHbuEH7KX6x9rQHTN4M5QB4dZ6vsZ8oAjQYuZooKsqxdgf6xnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/TBPRQUHAhjJjztwwLlHovzoizYg>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth@ietf.org, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-05.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:51:20 -0000

On Mar 30, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for making most of the suggested changes to the draft.  I see nothing happened in section 2.4 with the 'updates' text.  Since this requires changes to the referenced draft, it's easier to just state what is being updated in the previous RFC with this draft.  Could we work on that change and have it ready soon?  I'd rather do this before IETF last call or in IESG review as I think it pretty clearly should be done.

My interpretation from the WG discussion was that there was consensus that this document doesn't need to be marked as "updates RFC 4301". I updated the shepherd report to indicate that the WG defers to the IESG on judgement about this.

> The next telechat is April 9th and this won't make it on it, so there is time to get this update ready without holding up the draft.

Unless you want us to make more changes to the draft, you might as well put this into IETF Last Call now, even though it will miss the next telechat.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email