IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-05.txt

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 02 April 2015 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2061A1B12; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIvFJoQu87fY; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62DB51A1B00; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t322AAkc073381 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:10:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH4tT=pTa+bE8W2Xix99djfDjq7Fkpuj10-Pp=GAKDtgwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:10:10 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8CB67699-1986-417D-B270-678EBCBA7C29@vpnc.org>
References: <21780.37200.119692.51021@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <C5AE72F035554A3F9F02F7C283C536C4@buildpc> <CAHbuEH7KX6x9rQHTN4M5QB4dZ6vsZ8oAjQYuZooKsqxdgf6xnQ@mail.gmail.com> <A4CA1B96-3AF6-4D5F-9EFE-6794CBC31FBD@vpnc.org> <CAHbuEH5GV7wKv7PO++wgA_b3K_=dKESAx6xf0JOZTmU1REMbpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH4tT=pTa+bE8W2Xix99djfDjq7Fkpuj10-Pp=GAKDtgwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/nzaNOZbCP0Yt_6pj-oqX-w5Go90>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth@ietf.org, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-null-auth-05.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:10:15 -0000

On Apr 1, 2015, at 6:57 PM, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I went back to the email thread as I wanted to look at the consensus and don't see it the way Paul does.  
> Here is the end of the thread:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg09668.html
> 
> It reads as confusion with the term updates and most being ok with going in either direction, Paul against and Yaron more in favor.

Yes, exactly. So, it sounds like you see the consensus (and confusion) the way I do.

> Updates can update very specific text in a draft.  Since this just applies in this special case, the updates text needs to be clearly worded to reflect that or you copy in all the text that applies from the other draft.

Sounds fine. Who do you want to make that decision?

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email