IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] New version of IPsec Cluster Solution Draft posted [earliar, HA design team started]

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 19 July 2010 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062703A6B21 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.252
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.252 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.116, BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QpiM5UcSp7qV for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF763A68A4 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6JH2WCD096834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:02:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240812c86a35022352@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <4C447891.8060708@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinsIhov3aVuKqVRf7gmHG5oG70e5OoM6yWc7NAQ@mail.gmail.com> <4C447891.8060708@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:02:31 -0700
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New version of IPsec Cluster Solution Draft posted [earliar, HA design team started]
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:02:21 -0000

First off: thank you to the design team for the work you put into this. The rest of the WG didn't see this, but the group worked hard and met often.

One of the things that interests me as chair is: does this proposed protocol meet the requirement set out in our RFC-to-be <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09.txt>? If not, what is missing, and can it be added easily to the proposed protocol?

This will definitely be one of the points of discussion a week from now in Maastricht, but folks can start discussing it here on the list now in preparation for the meeting.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email