IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Mirja Kuehlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: (with DISCUSS)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 28 April 2017 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FDC126E3A; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aosi0_pH2doz; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D785129489; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k11so37783924ywb.1; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yYbWqXl1nql8i2ht1CCbjfRrGxj3oVptwVC5gbNIPR4=; b=dJW+X5GZIuzm+F5QxUZG7tgqErGZFs4pPR5X2jzOuMJVvMN9IkbNm7XzPLrYFnGeic gqfw+JTGG8AB3Gh0esg1kftyoRF2SQC+e2VqxIq1HGjrxfP+IAoUwW2M1R0AfzgKJzbu GqLjRNy2RJfvVj69NbOLbUlft4lngj1q3I/ly2G0tFgmBh6n+pi3RBDCkH352ckHcX77 9qwXrryib3GQ38HwgByJKIxL/GHCXaFCbaGXDdEvBjQYX/J2KHvubHKD+QiMt0DMVy00 H0nUpqHNnojw6IVypd2MHwfQ+vopZh+RtJDvA255WCmnUgq77zSF4Kq+yNh6ObWJ6hnp kn7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yYbWqXl1nql8i2ht1CCbjfRrGxj3oVptwVC5gbNIPR4=; b=LgHvqGc6XFNAQYapHUgPvCzCT+8dl0OaOZV+I7B3dchDGZqHL8B2gIAGgnj9RA3K+U l2RprO1tNrcJlVSbGiE3pw+Usy+C2Fzn1h6IuqyW22ne01vm/SBGRO5D/iWnJf/xW9V/ QkHbg3amW3IaCShV9VhnfFQeKVMNvo+zrAqRKT2zABnmR65WFS3uP64Lf/DLjj5pNfMC Tlm2v5HpoNGbPQDGFby7dNsS7O8T25fF/+5mDIuQU8nrckpzvSOkmZ3RHlS9ElPb4MgR mhQkH3TFc4LjAacYybAKzjQ/V+4eCZ2Sjyn9S8xYAVgwChiY9yVbCcyAGPBVVGuN+Qen Mi3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/69ArwF3xlDODyL+hKTSzZz9cQp4hGFu+L0a2wdJ/7WplMer6dq 0cCrzVa10L+GriUI94ThVlZKVR/JiA==
X-Received: by 10.129.76.148 with SMTP id z142mr12099935ywa.42.1493422902520; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.161.198 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <41594727-9667-42BD-ABB1-4583A3B00EA2@apple.com>
References: <149312449263.5884.11168631631187069210.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1CD2BB99-CDA2-472A-9833-741FB14CAE4A@apple.com> <752dde8c-0592-288e-6920-53a211834740@kuehlewind.net> <CABcZeBMj9UpzD+CpvOMKOkUsYNSL-UQCwuYt__5XCXtH=zyesA@mail.gmail.com> <22fac532-f30b-03e3-0757-aed213e5a346@kuehlewind.net> <22785.64570.259658.376130@fireball.acr.fi> <277aa94d-5aa1-7a28-94c7-81da0966c172@kuehlewind.net> <41594727-9667-42BD-ABB1-4583A3B00EA2@apple.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:41:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fb1vx=SzpJ_9gvtJ+SEH08nyBRGqb7F36PGw0EyJ6zmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, ipsec@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f29229abf9b054e429d0b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/aOCr2-g9LHWVVNr2XbvG4uXybl0>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Mirja Kuehlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 23:44:28 -0000

This is still Mirja's Discuss (which I supported), so I'll let her respond
to most of Tommy's proposed text changes, but on the last one ...

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

>
> 14.  IANA Considerations
>
>    This memo includes no request to IANA.
>
>  *  TCP port 4500 is already allocated to IPsec for NAT Traversal.  This
> port SHOULD*
> *   be used for TCP encapsulated IKE and ESP as described in this
> document.*
>

With no IANA actions, the entry in
https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=4500
for 4500/tcp will still point to http://www.iana.org/go/rfc3947 as the
reference.

Should that change when this draft is published?

Thanks,

Spencer, who may be confused, but wanted to ask before the draft is approved

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email