Re: [IPsec] Mirja Kuehlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-09: (with DISCUSS)

["Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

so first updating is a request to IANA, so you have to remove the first sentence. Then the update of the UPD port should probably be done in a separate document that potentially also obsoletes 3947 if that was missed with 7296.

Mirja


> Am 02.05.2017 um 11:17 schrieb Tero Kivinen <[e-mail]>:
> 
> Tommy Pauly writes:
>> I'll defer to Tero on this one. Tero, what do you prefer to do with the IANA
>> Considerations text?
> 
> [Note, that I am just talking as individual here, these IANA actions
> do not relate the IKEv2 registries where I am IANA Expert]
> 
> I proposed to change both the UDP and TCP references for the port
> 4500, as even if the RFC3947 did do the IANA actions, it does not
> describe the protocol used on the port. RFC3948 and 7296 does.
> 
> So from my previous email I would suggest following text:
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  14.  IANA Considerations
> 
>    This memo includes no request to IANA.
> 
>    TCP port 4500 is already allocated to IPsec for NAT Traversal.
>    This port SHOULD be used for TCP encapsulated IKE and ESP as
>    described in this document.
> 
>    This document updates both TCP and UDP references of the port 4500
>    to match the current protocols used on those ports:
> 
>    Keyword       Decimal    Description          Reference
>    -------       -------    -----------          ---------
>    ipsec-nat-t   4500/tcp   IPsec NAT-Traversal  [RFC-this-rfc]
>    ipsec-nat-t   4500/udp   IPsec NAT-Traversal  [RFC3948], [RFC7296]
> 
> -- 
> [e-mail]