IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] draft-pauly-ipsecme-split-dns

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 19 June 2018 23:42 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9120130FDE; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vTXWgtbQvBIV; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a132.g.dreamhost.com (homie-sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8893C130E4F; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a132.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a132.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9FD30002BA9; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=KQzzrQOAf/VNsJB8l6F2HoVhm8k=; b=RiQPWRdJLnn F0vMCzFSb5sHEMNPKliNuCMAEL8Kcaipsf8YyShxVE8c39zNGVtToTgq5KcMhpl8 J/0JP26dLEHVdAY5pUw/p+PrJHUKQq9ufo5JQnuD9wvyYeDjqoChyw5CHmsdGHMe u/f5St2GZZHzhzZ7I67CdUvE2TMLAPoY=
Received: from localhost (cpe-70-123-158-140.austin.res.rr.com [70.123.158.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a132.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B69F230002BA8; Tue, 19 Jun 2018 16:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:42:47 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns.all@ietf.org>, "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20180619234247.GG4218@localhost>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1806181702230.13143@bofh.nohats.ca> <CABcZeBOa8qMhDyCMzPTAtUBZTYPGehrhPrr6h4cVCjP4QZ1+Ew@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1806191109300.16269@bofh.nohats.ca> <CABcZeBPFw1iuHXV+_sEuMaRCYRSk1nH_FujeimOb=ViEAtvkVA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1806191159310.26059@bofh.nohats.ca> <CABcZeBN2HwiwVzAUjyZU+Q+toFM2jOKHD9xmKwM1V5qhUoULEQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180619183459.GC4218@localhost> <CABcZeBPh33RMWy=pWVSWPp9cDrzrRrVQXgw1BKPLy_W0_Wrdgg@mail.gmail.com> <20180619224651.GD4218@localhost> <3D85F03B-5D1B-4E74-AFA4-FF9419418FE5@nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D85F03B-5D1B-4E74-AFA4-FF9419418FE5@nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/fIwuppNoIUcp0aEllEh2mjI3BIE>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] draft-pauly-ipsecme-split-dns
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:42:53 -0000

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 07:31:24PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Jun 19, 2018, at 18:46, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Because my VPN clients don't connect promiscuously.  I can't say no
> > promiscuous VPN clients exist, but I imagine that none do.  And any
> > promiscuous VPN clients get what they deserve.
> 
> Opportunistic IPsec exists and are “promiscuously”. And the draft
> opens the Security Considerations section with:

But is it opportunistic VPN?  Regardless, that's fair enough.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email