Re: [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-mib-iptfs
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 13 March 2021 22:03 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E7F3A0FD8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 14:03:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pyx1vfvsvdcl for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 14:03:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7900B3A0FDC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 14:03:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (desktop4.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.16]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E7F1F44E; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:03:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 069B21A02D3; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:03:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, ipsec@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <50867aa3-cb83-d44-bd8f-87bcff22e9d3@nohats.ca>
References: <24646.13511.790350.976405@fireball.acr.fi> <50867aa3-cb83-d44-bd8f-87bcff22e9d3@nohats.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> message dated "Mon, 08 Mar 2021 10:23:40 -0500."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:03:47 -0500
Message-ID: <1508673.1615673027@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/vaU4w3NsigRE6JzwocPU4p-9M54>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-mib-iptfs
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 22:03:51 -0000
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Tero Kivinen wrote: >> Subject: [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-mib-iptfs >> >> This is the start of 2 week WG adoption call for this document ending >> 2021-03-22. Please send your reply about whether you support adopting >> this document as WG document to this list. >> >> This is part of the Traffic Flow Confidentiality work in the charter. > I am fine with adoption. > I would use "Bytes" instead of "Octects" for the byte counters. The use of the word "octets" is traditional in MIB documents, going back to the 1980s, when ASN.1 originated. Some machines had 9-bit bytes and 36-bit words :-) I also support adoption. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipsecme-… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipse… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] WG Adoption call for draft-fedyk-ipse… Michael Richardson