IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] #122: Integrity proposals with combined algorithms

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Thu, 26 November 2009 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4313A6BCD; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:17:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YHqhFRyMV5oB; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BA03A6BC7; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:16:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAQBGo4b003873 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:16:50 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.12.11) id nAQBGmi2001665; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:16:48 +0200 (EET)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <19214.25504.547607.471062@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:16:48 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <p06240826c733199b72e8@[10.20.30.158]>
References: <p06240846c730da1a07f5@[10.20.30.158]> <19211.59597.904754.490768@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <p06240861c731caf4cd1a@[10.20.30.158]> <19213.11094.860914.790618@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <p06240821c7330b32121e@[10.20.30.158]> <OF68D7C7F4.8EA0CD30-ON85257679.005AE6AD-85257679.005B1626@us.ibm.com> <p06240826c733199b72e8@[10.20.30.158]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
X-Edit-Time: 1 min
X-Total-Time: 1 min
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, ipsec-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] #122: Integrity proposals with combined algorithms
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:17:01 -0000

Paul Hoffman writes:
> MUST either offer no integrity algorithm or a single integrity
> algorithm of "none", with no integrity algorithm being the preferred
> method 

That is fine for me.

It would also be fine for me to change "preferred" with "RECOMMENDED"
(RFC2119 synonym for SHOULD), but I can accept on not using RFC2119
language too. 
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email