[Iptel] RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib-07.txt
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 11 August 2003 16:58 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22927 for <iptel-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19mFzh-0003R1-Hp for iptel-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:05 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h7BGw5RE013203 for iptel-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19mFzh-0003Qk-Da for iptel-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22906 for <iptel-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19mFzf-0007BP-00 for iptel-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:03 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19mFze-0007BM-00 for iptel-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:02 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19mFzc-0003PU-82; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:58:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19mFz1-0003PF-W6 for iptel@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:57:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22883 for <iptel@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:57:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19mFz0-0007BI-00 for iptel@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:57:22 -0400
Received: from tiere.net.avaya.com ([198.152.12.100]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19mFyz-0007BF-00 for iptel@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:57:21 -0400
Received: from tiere.net.avaya.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiere.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.0/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id h7BGvFeE022439 for <iptel@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:57:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com (h135-64-105-51.avaya.com [135.64.105.51]) by tiere.net.avaya.com (Switch-3.1.0/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id h7BGvCeE022395 for <iptel@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:57:13 -0400 (EDT)
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0
Message-ID: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F04258FE3@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib-07.txt
Thread-Index: AcNgC06hMO7V2N7sQ16WjcbvkepTpgAHageA
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, list iptel <iptel@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Iptel] RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib-07.txt
Sender: iptel-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: iptel-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Telephony <iptel.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:iptel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel>, <mailto:iptel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/iptel/>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:57:17 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bert is correct with respect to the OID size limit errors. I was using a non-edited version of the MIB (with the root OID xxxx-ed) and did not get the errors at compilation. These were rather major issues in my previous review, and I suggest that you fix them before advancing the document. I think that we talked about something similar the DESCRIPTION text suggested by Bert on the corridors in Vienna. Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com] > Sent: 11 August, 2003 4:20 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); list iptel > Cc: David Zinman; Bert Wijnen (E-mail) > Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib-07.txt > > > Thanks Dan for your review. > > I think the copyright-year will be addressed by RFC-Editor > when it gets there. > So unless there are othe reasons for a respin, I can live > with it for now. > But it seems anew rev may be wise because of my additional > comments below > > I wonder why sect 14 is needed. I leave this up to TSV AD(s) > on how to deal > with it. > > From a MIB review perspective I have a few additional comments): > - I think that RFC2788 needs to be added to normative > references since > this doc IMPORTs from the NETWORK-SERVICES-MIB in RFC2788 > - TRIP-TC module does not have a REVISION clause, which we actually DO > want to have. > - I get these smilint warnings: > .\TRIP-MIB:327: [5] {index-exceeds-too-large} index of > row `tripRouteTypeEntry' > can exceed OID size limit by 6 subidentifier(s) > .\TRIP-MIB:511: [5] {index-exceeds-too-large} index of > row `tripPeerEntry' can > exceed OID size limit by 6 subidentifier(s) > SMICng complains about the same. I see > 1.3.6.1.2.1.xxxx.1.2.1.6 tripRouteTypePeer > as the first accessible object int tripRouteTypeEntry. So > prefix is 11 subids > index objects are 5 integer-based objects and a var size > octet string. > so we have 5 plus 1 (for lenght) plus number of octets as > index part. > So we have 6 fixed (5 integers plus length value) subids > plus one for every > octet in the octet string. So max size for OCTET STRING should be > 111 octets, not 117. > Similar calculation for tripPeerEntry seem to tell me max > lenght can be 113 > instead of 119. > This makes me thin k that it is kind of strange to ha ve > different size for InetAddress, > is it not. Another way to solve these concerns is to add > something to the DESCRIPTION > clause that states the implementation issues w.r.t. 128 > subids instad of setting > arbitray size constrains in the SYNTAX field (that we may > regret if the 128 subid > limit ever gets removed). A good example of text for this > would be in > arcEntry in draft-ietf-disman-conditionmib-09.txt or > sctpAssocLocalAddrEntry in > draft-ietf-sigtran-sctp-mib-10.txt > - smicng (strict checking) also complains: > E: f(trip.mi2), (1629,33) Item "applRFC2788Group" > should be IMPORTed > it is not a MUST that you do import it. But as the > mib-review-guidelines state, > it would be good to do so to not cause confusion. > > From a generic review > - Missing reference [BCP0014] > - Ref [RFC2026] probably goes away when this becomes an RFC > > Thanks, > Bert > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] > > Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2003 14:34 > > To: list iptel > > Cc: David Zinman; Bert Wijnen (E-mail) > > Subject: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib-07.txt > > > > > > The latest version addresses all major issues in my previous > > review, and does not seem to have introduced new ones. > > > > I am left with two editorial comments, which may be addressed > > down the road: > > 1. The copyright year in the DESCRIPTION clauses of the two > > MIB modules still says 2002. > > 2. One of the Area Directors was replaced since the previous > > Internet-Draft publication (Section 14). > > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > _______________________________________________ Iptel mailing list Iptel@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel
- [Iptel] Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib-07.… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- [Iptel] RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [Iptel] Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib… Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Iptel] FW: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- [Iptel] RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip-mib… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: [Iptel] RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip… Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- RE: [Iptel] RE: Comments on draft-ietf-iptel-trip… Peterson, Jon