Re: "RFC4941bis" and draft-gont-6man-non-stable-iids

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 21 July 2017 04:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E45126DFF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVTi36bH-Q7l for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D241E126C23 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id s70so19723045pfs.0 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4PLhS1uxrjpxe8jqPheynUp9Se2SGexHHthmCfbq6WE=; b=mM3CwQgXLaG/KdDYvlFOlZiUjsUy/tfAcklRIkdlK/ZlxPQ8IGmh4WCJhCcC1uMo8l CFihQnRaIyoayEGnxUUtwgiyLiwrbR5NCVo1V4a3oMvfjwN16kqEcAHq+EwunqA+vtWB 0eZJ2qHJ4oVV87OJxQWaPn8hXd+APyBj62HhOfMUzTMuQq+bF34Icib/DOzOtK2nC93w /TiyDMxXrwthv3SAkzLia8XGA4nOWYy7jo21zAMnz3n3T8UNQXQ/EbSmASLajan3BLDb fcDeMsOHimBG26FxJDkSY68HjVIBv/c8oxIo1h1Jr1OqyWUUupYCDyy7HS/Lvuoqnb4T VMPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4PLhS1uxrjpxe8jqPheynUp9Se2SGexHHthmCfbq6WE=; b=pEeQOCVcwdKB+cZFHR6KfPKv3V6KeeS3O0vxCPSn9wwdVAto2wchGlHH4let8tUTs3 ZKpg8WWA5oFniEC7N+qAGVJ9EzYl7dg2SWcoT55nH/lnNpwjsoamvCiKH+zgvsIh2Img UXkADirfqGWeqUcFZcn/bUEs5lMYQKTWVE11LxcF7wF+IYKfpUe+f6TKt6jRxNbh1Ql5 h9NNZbDLFBS0CwkcMHn3hziRRCnkwI4UViHOKBMiCL5vIUBqPQUp2ihVsWHOWMf72G1p XbOAvl4TWbIBJXddw0ay3j6z8CwMpvrhdCAjojc5vWnjyDtT3r4/YWvjiVWF4gZrvatF H7BQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113S3CRhrs2JfioqlMgVgI5eHLrZF+ww0eTBYOyviwgNj7YuDaDP domcV6UlWX6t6bxJ
X-Received: by 10.84.224.13 with SMTP id r13mr6554003plj.327.1500612052175; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.148.121.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t3sm6464570pfb.147.2017.07.20.21.40.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 21:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: "RFC4941bis" and draft-gont-6man-non-stable-iids
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
References: <4d1ef3d1-1c21-ec76-7c1b-7bb0f5eaa805@si6networks.com> <51F41F55-27B2-43BC-9199-FBE59B98BCFB@jisc.ac.uk> <f227bbe9-c038-185c-7868-67c9a6a89d5d@si6networks.com> <D4D7CEFD-AB01-41A4-A874-B0D8A485A4C8@jisc.ac.uk> <BF53B560-5B04-4656-BC3C-C789E809DC50@gmail.com> <6a64b2ad-6cc6-40e3-efa1-dee2eb2206cf@si6networks.com> <71446686-1B03-4A06-B4D3-74AFF6B98C14@jisc.ac.uk> <2d54e5d5-b69d-e43b-8559-1c6b5de8e58b@si6networks.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <71240a1a-6e8f-3509-a2f2-dc38308ff1c1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:40:56 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2d54e5d5-b69d-e43b-8559-1c6b5de8e58b@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/2U9uqqtqeFiYeKz4AGoKW6DS8yU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 04:40:54 -0000

On 20/07/2017 23:58, Fernando Gont wrote:
...
> My mental model is that a bis document essentially incorporates errata
> and minor changes to a previous RFC. But this doesn't seem whre we want
> to go here.

I think that is actually an over-interpretation** of the suffix "bis".

It isn't in any way an IETF rule, it's just a habit (copied from ISO
or ITU-T, I suspect). All it tells me is that draft-something-rfc9999bis
is intended to *obsolete and replace* RFC 9999. That doesn't mean that
it is based directly on the text of RFC 9999, although it might be, and
often is, for convenience.

It's only an ill-defined naming convention, in the end.

** and the dictionary meaning is different: twice; for a second time; again; once more.

   Brian