slaac-renum: Food for thought (Fwd: Re: [v6ops] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum)

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sun, 12 April 2020 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E853A0EB1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1MzcD6DWZF6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FC5E3A0EB0 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B535F80844; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: slaac-renum: Food for thought (Fwd: Re: [v6ops] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum)
To: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
References: <6A8DBEC3-198F-4C20-A223-2F6E76F4B639@steffann.nl>
Message-ID: <faba3c79-9474-ca6b-e025-a28238be243e@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 12:51:11 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6A8DBEC3-198F-4C20-A223-2F6E76F4B639@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/4RBeS6emIOJewRtiqJ4LaGuo8Q4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:51:37 -0000

Folks,

Most people agree with this, but.... the reminder is always welcome.


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:15:56 +0200
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
To: Owen Delong <owen@delong.com>
CC: v6ops@ietf.org

> However, this still hinges on the assumption that ISPs will behave in the manner you describe. I remain unconvinced that will be the case.

This

And refusing to help those whose ISP doesn't behave like you would like 
them to is making it even worse. This WG needs to grow up and realise 
that we don't live in a perfect world. We should work towards making it 
better for the users, not shunning those whose ISP doesn't confirm to 
our dreams.

The internet is a for-profit system these days, and despite how much I 
dislike it, we need to provide incentives for ISPs to do things the 
right way. Hurting the poor users who don't have any 
knowledge/choice/etc is the wrong way to do that. Same as with the 
Android DHCPv6 disaster: it's hurting the wrong people. We need to work 
on standards and tools to make it better, not making it worse for those 
who cannot help it.

Cheers,
Sander