Kings…

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Sun, 12 April 2020 11:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818D93A2190 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 04:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NkSerXyk065K for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 04:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E55C3A2180 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 04:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E92FA6 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:date:date:message-id:subject:subject:mime-version :content-type:content-type:from:from:received:received; s=mail; t=1586628963; bh=jGewoJI6R2KScgtrC/qauazrFJ4QecnhUzl/So5sjZ8=; b= EyIkPO/9qH5jjbJq4Jy+DGXX7OWnDU+iuyfQUDWh8k4rLCXLloB7PxnxUMgnbZyt YfhkT325fVuZ3e4iNU1ZvX9b7pRdIzH8FJtYMmHkcjmltPxKUurBwijb5kXi2rJ9 lpk1z0eQZ8mUl5nvPGCRN411sik61zl50j/W3EVU5to=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id QxmJ5x4rW1vP for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:16:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:b0f3:e4b0:d9ab:c91d] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:b0f3:e4b0:d9ab:c91d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40ACE9D for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:16:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_01DD0DE3-8749-4310-868B-249F1BCF8940"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Subject: Kings…
Message-Id: <08084511-6899-4DC8-BE90-85138F4540AE@steffann.nl>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 20:16:01 +0200
To: 6man <6man@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/PhVorwTo3CBDqtsTkvGxDFxgKbg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 11:35:11 -0000

Hi,

I have repeatedly seen WG chairs acting as kings here, taking it upon themselves to decide what is best for the working group. I just witnessed another occasion and I've had enough of this, so I'm off for a while. I hope things will have improved when I feel like taking the IETF serious again... Considering its responsibilities it's currently a joke :(

So long, and keep the fish,
Sander